Two decades after her release from prison, Teresa Beatty feels she is still being punished.

When her mother died two years ago, the state of Connecticut put a lien on the Stamford home she and her siblings inherited. It said she owed $83,762 to cover the cost of her 2 1/2 year imprisonment for drug crimes.

Now, she’s afraid she’ll have to sell her home of 51 years, where she lives with two adult children, a grandchild and her disabled brother.

“I’m about to be homeless,” said Beatty, 58, who in March became the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the state law that charges prisoners $249 a day for the cost of their incarceration. “I just don’t think it’s right, because I feel I already paid my debt to society. I just don’t think it’s fair for me to be paying twice.”

All but two states have so-called “pay-to-stay” laws that make prisoners pay for their time behind bars, though not every state actually pursues people for the money. Supporters say the collections are a legitimate way for states to recoup millions of taxpayer dollars spent on prisons and jails.

...

Connecticut’s partial repeal went into effect July 1. The state is projected to collect about $5.5 million less per year from ex-prisoners because of the change.

State Sen. John Kissel, the top Republican on the legislature’s Judiciary Committee, said he opposed the repeal passed by the Democratic majority, but might support reforms like allowing inmates to pay off debt in installments.

Kissel said that while Beatty’s situation tugs at one’s heartstrings, “Everybody has issues.”

“The policy is to make one appreciate that your incarceration costs money,” he said. “The taxpayers footed the bill. They didn’t do anything wrong. And knowing that one has to pay the state back a reasonable sum on a regular basis is not a bad policy.”

Connecticut used to collect prison debt by attaching an automatic lien to every inmate, claiming half of any financial windfall they might receive for up to 20 years after they are released from prison, said Dan Barrett, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut. That included things like insurance settlements, inheritances and lottery winnings.

The state even collected money awarded to inmates in lawsuits over alleged abuse by prison guards.

  • sammer510 [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    All but two states have these laws??? Am I reading this right? Holy shit what the fuck. Now I'm going to be angry for the rest of the day

    • Lussy [any, hy/hym]
      ·
      2 years ago

      ITS FUCKING INSANE wtfff

      that’s nearly 100,000 a year.

      It’s so exceptionally cruel the death penalty would be a more humane sentence

    • 21018 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Afaik it's county by county in those states too

  • emizeko [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Kissel said that while Beatty’s situation tugs at one’s heartstrings, “Everybody has issues.”

    how about we give you an "issue" right between your fucking eyes

  • usa_suxxx
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    All but two states have so-called “pay-to-stay” laws that make prisoners pay for their time behind bars, though not every state actually pursues people for the money. Supporters say the collections are a legitimate way for states to recoup millions of taxpayer dollars spent on prisons and jails.

    :wtf-am-i-reading:

    :warf-wtf:

    :jesse-wtf:

    • fox [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Damn just arrest fewer people, it's even easier than arresting them

      • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Turning former prisoners into a permanent debt-saddled underclass is a feature, not a bug. Slavery is explicitly, word-for-word constitutional, you just have to put them in prison first.

    • TheSpectreOfGay [he/him, she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      i thought their way to "recoup millions of taxpayer dollars spent on prisons and jails" was to make the prisoners do slave labour

      • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        "It's not slave labor they're paid to do it"

        And yet the penny an hour pay doesn't even cover these bullshit costs :soviet-hmm:

  • jackmarxist [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Uruguayans checkmate tankie

    On a serious note, this is basically slavery where the slave even has to pay their master for the honour being their slave. I thought prisons were free to live in.

    • RION [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It's not just this. Phone calls are marked up far beyond the typical price per minute. Packaged food (read: food less likely to be heinously unfit for consumption) is the same, as well as toiletries the average person would consider to be essential. Depending on whatever crime you've been convicted of, you might be made to pay into a victim's fund. All of these charges suck up the slave wages inmates are paid for labor and move on to burden their family on the outside.

  • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is literally that ancap copypasta where the criminals pay the cop for arresting them holy shit what a parody of a country

  • red552 [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I love it when Americans call other countries "authoritarian"

  • 4zi [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The policy is to make one appreciate that your incarceration costs money,” he said. “The taxpayers footed the bill.

    :no-mouth-must-scream:

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    deleted by creator