the vast majority are hearing about Chiang Kai-Shek for the first time, will infer that he was an enemy of le evil see see pee, and invent a fictitious Chiang Kai-Shek based on that
The difference is that ten years ago a neocon would have done this with full knowledge of what CKS was about and they'd have been winking into the camera. Now you've got your MTGs who have no clue and idk which is worse.
How many of her followers know who Chiang Kai-Shek is, no way it's more than 10%. Worst virtue signaling I've seen in ages.
the vast majority are hearing about Chiang Kai-Shek for the first time, will infer that he was an enemy of le evil see see pee, and invent a fictitious Chiang Kai-Shek based on that
deleted by creator
The difference is that ten years ago a neocon would have done this with full knowledge of what CKS was about and they'd have been winking into the camera. Now you've got your MTGs who have no clue and idk which is worse.