Byzantium was in decline for seven centuries until the Ottomans pulled the plug. Rome was in decline for several centuries prior to its sacking.
Climate change and the accompanying plagues, droughts, famines, and calamities that accompany it might accelerate and exacerbate the state's capacity and willingness to respond to these crises, but all it might mean is that this is a new normal added to the reproleterization of American life.
I don't really have a point but it is just a thought that I (perhaps others) are going to have to accept that future, and that is a kind of new world I am unsure as to how to adapt to.
deleted by creator
I don't mean "not" I mean literally can't. As in, nobody even knows how to do it and nobody has for centuries. Imagine if our technology was still from the 17th century and also nobody knew how to fix it when it broke so it just... stayed broken forever and became a ruin.
deleted by creator
We absolutely can fix Flint by replacing the pipes, that's not a mystical unknown technology for us. Flint is just a matter of no political will to help the helpless.
deleted by creator
Well obviously, morally Flint is much worse than Dark Ages London. I wasn't talking about how the English were morally worse than the Romans at building aqueducts for 1000 years.
deleted by creator