• space_comrade [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Looks like a low vaccination rate problem. In most articles experts are calling for more kids getting their boosters, which yeah I would completely agree with, boosters are cool and good and I would consider it a prerequisite for lifting strict zero-covid.

    Again, how come Vietnam and Cuba don't have hundreds of thousands of deaths without having a strict zero-covid policy?

      • space_comrade [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        The article is paywalled, here's an archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20221123125303/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/23/vaccinated-people-now-make-up-majority-covid-deaths/

        The article is fairly scant on details but it seems the point it's trying to make is get the updated booster because your old vaccine immunity evaporated, which uh yeah makes sense. It doesn't look like the vaccines got worse, just that people refuse to get their boosters.

        • ButtBidet [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Fifty-eight percent of coronavirus deaths in August were people who were vaccinated or boosted

          If I put in the effort to find the research that shows that countless people with vaccines and boosters were killed and disabled, will it change your mind? Like I can do it, but I suspect that you're not going to budge.

          • space_comrade [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I get that vaccines aren't miracle silver bullets and some people are gonna die regardless of whether they're vaccinated or not.

            I still think it's just plain fucking unrealistic to keep zero-covid going for the long term. The world collectively (save for a few countries) fucked up with dealing with Covid and that's not just gonna change, all countries are going to have to find ways of living with it.

            • ButtBidet [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Better drugs are coming out. Getting covid in 2023 will be easy safer than in 2022.

              Edit

              and some people are gonna die

              reread that

    • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Vietnam did have a strict zero covid, now they have thousands dead. Cuba had their borders locked, now they also have thousands dead. In both cases we have no idea how many hav long covid; which is why our pediatric hospitals are packed with rsv cases, because a significant chunk of the US population is now immunocompromised. We can stop now. You're clearly on board with some number of social murder.

      • space_comrade [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You’re clearly on board with some number of social murder.

        Everybody is on board with some number of social murder. Otherwise you should also be for banning cigarettes, alcohol, cars, being fat etc. A lot of human activities and behaviors are potentially hazardous yet we indulge in them, I don't see how this is any different. People die from the flu too, why don't we have zero-flu policies?

        Also it's not like I'm saying China should imitate the west, just that there is probably a more tolerable middle-ground.

        You pretending that chinese people aren't gonna be pissed with policies like these in the long term is just plain idealism. There's literally a person from China in this thread saying they're fucking sick of it already.

        Also looking at Cuba it doesn't look that bad, it seems they got through the worst of it like many other countries: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/cuba/

        • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          People die from the flu too, why don’t we have zero-flu policies?

          Good question I’ve actually been asking that for years. During flu season we should 100,000% do screening tests for flu at peoples workplaces and schools and quarantine and isolate those who are sick. Also mandatory vaccines and masks in public places.

          It would save thousands of lives yearly as well as save millions of dollars in “productivity” because people with the flu are bad at working, and also prevents cumulative years of human misery.

          • space_comrade [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Sure I agree. I just don't think weeks long flu lockdowns forever would be a good idea.

            • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Sure, but I’d much rather be told I have to quarantine for a week for flu exposure than be out for a week for having the fucking flu

              And I’d much rather the guy who came into work next door with the flu gets told to quarantine for a week than me getting the flu from the cashier.

            • anoncpc [comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              They lock down because they don't want millions to get sick at once, overflow the hospital and break the healthcare system. The flu doesn't overflow the hospital every year. Seem like there's still peoples still don't know the purpose of lock down. Just because yank load up body bags after body bags into truck and tell prisoners to dig grave, or Indian stand outside the hospital for oxygen and burn their body outside, doesn't mean China should go that route.

            • THC
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • space_comrade [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I love how people just keep strawmaning my position and thinking I want to let it rip throughout China as it did in the US even though I restatated again and again that the west isn't being strict enough. Covid policies aren't a single binary on-off switch Jesus fucking Christ.

                I guess Cuba and Vietnam are liberal too, huh?

                • THC
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  deleted by creator

        • ButtBidet [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Everybody is on board with some number of social murder

          Holy fuck, no

            • VenetianMask [any]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Framing the idea that letting people eat without top down nutritionist enforcement is social murder? Jesus I hope that's a minority opinion.

              • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Maybe we just have different ideas about how a ban on bing unhealthy would look like.

                I’d like it to be helpful and free of cost or stigma, but certainly in the west it would be rounding everyone over a certain bmi up and depositing them in internment camps to perform manual labor until they meet whatever requirement.

                Probably make the camps private, the product of that labor something that’s commodified and have a non-stop rolling reality tv show based in it.

                The framing of “being fat” is bad because it doesn’t touch on why people are fat and only addresses their present state, but we can certainly look past that obvious part and assume in good faith the poster isn’t advocating institution of permanent krystal burger nacht with the gutstahpo beating you up and carting you off to fat camp brought to you by Carl’s Jr.

        • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Otherwise you should also be for banning cigarettes, alcohol, cars, being fat etc

          Despite the best efforts of those who make money off of them, all of these things are still significantly easier to avoid than the most infectious virus known to man.