https://h5.tu.qq.com/web/ai-2d/cartoon/index
the interface is weird
https://ibb.co/b7jQJFV
https://ibb.co/VTTdxyN
https://ibb.co/9NZWMxc
https://ibb.co/m4Z18tq
https://ibb.co/r430M0f
I love how everyone is made to look more handsome in a really artificial and exaggerated way, except for Che. Che is just Che.
che too. they gave his collar embroidery, made his beard more groomed, and gave him eyelashes
that's anime for you.
also this thing can't do people of color for shit (really makes you think)
also this thing can’t do people of color for shit (really makes you think)
Its probably mostly trained on Chinese art. Maybe Japanese and Korean also. Makes sense why it would have this failing.
I do want to see an Art AI thats mostly trained on African and Indian art and how bad it would be at rendering Crackers and East Asians.
gaddafi time :gaddafi-happy:
https://ibb.co/Zgx2XWT
https://ibb.co/0fPpwFc
https://ibb.co/89shqKj
https://ibb.co/jg5LqC3
https://ibb.co/WPXMCDY
I want to post pictures of kim il sung but I dont understand how to use the website
idk what it looks like on mobile but on desktop there's a big purple/orange gradient button with white text on it. you click that, then a woman's photo pops up with a big button underneath that, you click that, then you select a file.
it keeps throwing me a message "the event is too hot" which is translated. guess it means too much traffic?
No, it means the picture you're trying to upload is too hot :volcel-judge:
Also deages? Why?
I was perfectly happy living without Twink!Stalin
i find playing with the input results vastly different outputs
https://ibb.co/4sfcxwb
https://ibb.co/jhdFP8h
https://ibb.co/4Vv2ks9
https://ibb.co/5G9gxYB
https://ibb.co/DY1R0rG
also you can submit the same image multiple times and get different results anyway
https://ibb.co/9vgRtLk
https://ibb.co/ypWG7q0
https://ibb.co/0MqbZpy
https://ibb.co/x8ZSTbJ
https://ibb.co/z2y3Tt5
Did some colour correction and minor edits:
https://ibb.co/Xyj3rmt
nice! he's still got the double decker moustache heheheh.
ironically even though it was inaccurate, i liked this one the best. something about the high contrast lighting is way cooler looking imo than the soft lighting that most of these have
Sometimes it adds facial hair. I ran Rudy Giuliani through it and it gave him a full beard
Yes it's going to be very fun to be gently washed over by vaguely off and uncanny and just a little inhuman artwork for several years until the technology is good enough to drive human artists underground, becoming an incestuous cesspool of self-reference until every piece of art is a perfect phong shaded sphere
Addendum: can't wait for online nazis to forcefeed every AI with Hitler's paintings and only Hitler's paintings
It keeps making me into a girl just because I haven’t gotten a haircut lol
Don't you know this will literally KILL DISABLED ARTISTS???????
i'm sincerely confused by what you're saying. If anything, technology and AI would enable disabled artists to do things that would ordinarily be outside of their physical ability. Technology is above all an assistant to human productivity and creativity. It is the mode of production which is the problem. Marx pointed this out when discussing luddites destroying machines:
The enormous destruction of machinery that occurred in the English manufacturing districts during the first 15 years of this century, chiefly caused by the employment of the power-loom, and known as the Luddite movement, gave the anti-Jacobin governments of a Sidmouth, a Castlereagh, and the like, a pretext for the most reactionary and forcible measures. It took both time and experience before the workpeople learnt to distinguish between machinery and its employment by capital, and to direct their attacks, not against the material instruments of production, but against the mode in which they are used.
