The reviewer is not supposed to always be right, but to give a perspective with some evidence and flare to let you know what style of movie and the general quality. If they disagree that's fine, provided they keep their voice and discuss more than just what they felt. :gigachad:
That's why pairing him with Siskell worked so well. They were on a similar level when it came to cinema interpretation but the best back and forth would come from Siskell ragging on Ebert for dragging something that was clearly never meant to be more than a silly popcorn flick.
Ebert hating something I liked :shrug-outta-hecks: there are still a few memorable insights and one-liners in this review, because that is the mark of a good critic
ebert reviews that ream things you also dont like :so-true: what a clever bastard!
ebert hating something you liked :wojak-nooo: you didn't get it you pompous patrician!
The reviewer is not supposed to always be right, but to give a perspective with some evidence and flare to let you know what style of movie and the general quality. If they disagree that's fine, provided they keep their voice and discuss more than just what they felt. :gigachad:
deleted by creator
many people are saying this :theory-gary:
You make a strong counterpoint. I'm with AnarchaPrincess on this one.
@GreenTeaRedFlag fucking owned
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter
It is known
Jokes on you
I don't like movies :soviet-chad:
This but unironically :gigachad:
whenever ebert likes something i like: wow we are both INFALLIBLE GENIUSES
That's why pairing him with Siskell worked so well. They were on a similar level when it came to cinema interpretation but the best back and forth would come from Siskell ragging on Ebert for dragging something that was clearly never meant to be more than a silly popcorn flick.
Ebert hating something I liked :shrug-outta-hecks: there are still a few memorable insights and one-liners in this review, because that is the mark of a good critic
:yes-chad: