DPRK_Chopra to the_dunk_tank • edit-21 month ago*Permanently Deleted*trashmessage-squaremessage-square19 fedilinkarrow-up122file-text
arrow-up122message-square*Permanently Deleted*trashDPRK_Chopra to the_dunk_tank • edit-21 month agomessage-square19 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDialecticalShaman [none/use name]hexbear7·2 years agoNo clue. On one hand their mature platforms are quite good at what they do, on the other there's the :melon-musk: factor. If they crash it'll be into earth. The reusability of Falcon 9 is a big milestone but Energia 2 could have put us there in the 90s :ussr-cry: . link
minus-squareDialecticalShaman [none/use name]hexbear5·edit-22 years agoI agree with you, but I hedge my statements on this topic as I've been criticized here for "defending space treats" when simply correcting the record. Posters here tend to assume spacex is on the same level as tesla. link
No clue. On one hand their mature platforms are quite good at what they do, on the other there's the :melon-musk: factor.
If they crash it'll be into earth.
The reusability of Falcon 9 is a big milestone but Energia 2 could have put us there in the 90s :ussr-cry: .
deleted by creator
I agree with you, but I hedge my statements on this topic as I've been criticized here for "defending space treats" when simply correcting the record. Posters here tend to assume spacex is on the same level as tesla.