Comrade, I think you should be more broadly anti-theist. The evils committed by Abrahamic religions have the mirror images in basically every religion that got tied into governance or power structures more generally. I don't think there's any way to argue Christians are indicted due to connections with feudalism and capitalism that Hinduism isn't with the caste system of India. Shintoism was just as central to Japanese colinization of Asia as Christianity was to conquest of the Americas. Buddhism in Tibet was used to enforce an ethno-state just like Judaism is in Israel.
That makes sense, start with what you know, but I think it's important to really try and learn about an issue outside of your personal experience before trying to take a real principled stand on it.
I think that sort of argument is a little reductive. It isn't hard to find people of any belief system doing bad things, but if that's all it takes, then someone could point to like the Black Hammer cult as a reason to dismiss communism, and that's obviously absurd, but that's where having a more nuanced look at various belief systems is necessary in order to engage with them and criticize them effectively.
Is it rational to dismiss an idea because people who believe in it have done bad things? Not inherently. When people look at religion, there's this assumption that belief or membership in the religion is supposed to be inherently edifying, supposed to make you a better person - but that assumption doesn't hold true for all religions. Many traditional folk religions, like Shinto, for example, are basically just describing the world and the various creatures and spirits that supposedly inhabit it, and describing what you can do to avoid invoking their wrath. Likewise, an idea isn't necessarily bad or wrong just because it is used in a bad way. Atheism functions as a perfect example of that, actually - we saw how Atheism was used as a tool to breed Islamophobia to justify US imperialism, but that doesn't prove that Atheism is wrong.
That's not to say that these belief systems cannot or should not be criticized, but it's important to understand what claims they make and don't make in order to make meaningful and effective criticisms.
An economic system that has observable real world results is not comparable to belief in invisible magic people.
Is it rational to dismiss an idea because people who believe in it have done bad things?
It's not rational to give any weight to an idea for which no evidence exists and for which the basic premises would require severe deviations from the observable physical laws of the universe.
Shinto
State Shinto was one of the foundations of Imperial Japanese fascism. There are lots of Buddhist fascists, too. The list of religions that haven't been used as a justification to murder people is really short. The idea that some religions are "harmless" because they seem quaint or have a personable façade is not well grounded in history.
that doesn’t prove that Atheism is wrong.
Atheism isn't right or wrong. It's not a belief system. It's simply a recognition that there is no evidence of magic and no reason to treat the suggestion that there is seriously.
I already made the point that an idea being weaponized for bad purposes doesn't disprove it. We could imagine a world where a state reacts to flat-earthers by executing their entire bloodline, for example, but that wouldn't make the earth any less round. It would warrant a critical examination of the round-earthers' beliefs, but we would still have to establish a logical connection for how believing in a round earth would cause someone to be more prone to doing stuff like that.
Shinto
The only thing I said about Shinto is that it doesn't claim to make you a good person. That doesn't mean that I consider it "harmless" or "quaint." As I said, "That’s not to say that these belief systems cannot or should not be criticized."
Referencing the point I made above, we can easily connect Shinto to Japanese imperialism by pointing out the belief in the emperor's divinity. However, there's the question of, is imperial divinity an inherent aspect of Shinto? Traditionally, not really - poor farmers in feudal Japan barely knew who the emperor even was, and nowadays the emperor has explicitly denied being divine, but Shinto still exists. Does a widespread belief in mythological creatures make it easier for fascism to take root? Maybe, but then, fascism took root in Germany without such a belief (though the Nazis loved their mythology, tbf). It might be worthwhile to study how Shinto evolved, to see when and how it acquired a fascist character, and how it changed after WWII, in order to understand how fascism can make use of various belief systems and how those belief systems change in respone to fascism. Not only to better critique Shinto, but also to gain a better understanding of how fascists gain power.
My point is not to defend Shinto, which I have no investment in and I will happily agree is nonsense and bad, but to say that it's better to study and understand beliefs first, and then provide a more nuanced critique, rather than painting things with broad generalizations that are more relevant to the belief systems that you're more familiar with.
Atheism isn’t right or wrong. It’s not a belief system. It’s simply a recognition that there is no evidence of magic and no reason to treat the suggestion that there is seriously.
Atheism isn't a belief system, it's neither right or wrong, it's just the correct set of beliefs that magic isn't real? Is there a difference between a set of beliefs and a belief system? Is there a difference between being "right or wrong" vs being supported or unsupported by reason and evidence? I don't understand what you mean at all.
I personally am a Catholic, I don't hold an anti-theist position. I just wanted to point out to space_comerad that they were really not thinking through their position, there's nothing unique to Abrahamic faiths in their failures. If the criticism of Christianity is that it has been used to oppress people, then that critique must be held to every one of these faiths.
That's understandable. My genuine take is that belief in a benevolent higher power is an insult to the countless people suffering every day that will never get reprieve and eventually die after a life of suffering
(but all of that said I'm not actually into the idea of stopping people from being religious)
It can be bad if that faith that help is on the way is entirely misplaced. No amount of prayer will lift someone from the conditions that led to their suffering
Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, the hadith outlines the story of a Bedouin man who was leaving his camel without tying it. The Prophet (PBUH) asked him “Why don’t you tie down your camel?” The Bedouin answered, “I put my trust in Allah.” The Prophet then replied, “Tie your camel first, and then put your trust in Allah.”
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.
Kinda disagree with Marx on that one. I think religion is here to stay for a while even after achieving communism, it's gonna become much less important for sure but the concept isn't going anywhere as long as there are still unanswered questions in science.
Honestly the older I get the more my feelings of annoyance start to extend to astrology and crystals and wicca, etc. Like with that neo-spirituality stuff you don't even have the excuse of being indoctrinated into it, you willingly sold your soul to a chunk of quartz
It's very uncomfortable finding yourself in a situation where people are treating magic as a serious topic. Your options are basically "dissemble to keep the peace" or "admit that you think the whole thing is absurd and you consider the rest of the company gullible and a little pathetic." At least with casual discussions of astrology you can just ask people about their lives without actually engaging with the magic component. When people start talking about "manifesting" shit I turn green and leave the room.
Best case scenario I'm getting dragged into some supernatural dickhead's social order, worst case scenario i'm getting dragged into a bunch of grifters using some supernatural dickhead as a hand puppet's social order, and i don't really want either. The (very convenient for them) threat of eternal punishment be damned, only way i'm doing this is my way
Anti-theist gang lets go
State atheism ayyyyoooo
gaaaang shit
every socialist state has it for a reason
:party-sicko:
Gang gang
I'm not anti-theist, I'm just anti-abrahamic religions. They kinda fucking suck. Jesus and Mohammed were based occasionally but only occasionally.
Comrade, I think you should be more broadly anti-theist. The evils committed by Abrahamic religions have the mirror images in basically every religion that got tied into governance or power structures more generally. I don't think there's any way to argue Christians are indicted due to connections with feudalism and capitalism that Hinduism isn't with the caste system of India. Shintoism was just as central to Japanese colinization of Asia as Christianity was to conquest of the Americas. Buddhism in Tibet was used to enforce an ethno-state just like Judaism is in Israel.
Yeah most religions probably do suck, you're right, I've singled out abrahamic ones because those are the only ones I'm knowledgeable about.
That makes sense, start with what you know, but I think it's important to really try and learn about an issue outside of your personal experience before trying to take a real principled stand on it.
I think that sort of argument is a little reductive. It isn't hard to find people of any belief system doing bad things, but if that's all it takes, then someone could point to like the Black Hammer cult as a reason to dismiss communism, and that's obviously absurd, but that's where having a more nuanced look at various belief systems is necessary in order to engage with them and criticize them effectively.
Is it rational to dismiss an idea because people who believe in it have done bad things? Not inherently. When people look at religion, there's this assumption that belief or membership in the religion is supposed to be inherently edifying, supposed to make you a better person - but that assumption doesn't hold true for all religions. Many traditional folk religions, like Shinto, for example, are basically just describing the world and the various creatures and spirits that supposedly inhabit it, and describing what you can do to avoid invoking their wrath. Likewise, an idea isn't necessarily bad or wrong just because it is used in a bad way. Atheism functions as a perfect example of that, actually - we saw how Atheism was used as a tool to breed Islamophobia to justify US imperialism, but that doesn't prove that Atheism is wrong.
That's not to say that these belief systems cannot or should not be criticized, but it's important to understand what claims they make and don't make in order to make meaningful and effective criticisms.
An economic system that has observable real world results is not comparable to belief in invisible magic people.
It's not rational to give any weight to an idea for which no evidence exists and for which the basic premises would require severe deviations from the observable physical laws of the universe.
State Shinto was one of the foundations of Imperial Japanese fascism. There are lots of Buddhist fascists, too. The list of religions that haven't been used as a justification to murder people is really short. The idea that some religions are "harmless" because they seem quaint or have a personable façade is not well grounded in history.
Atheism isn't right or wrong. It's not a belief system. It's simply a recognition that there is no evidence of magic and no reason to treat the suggestion that there is seriously.
I already made the point that an idea being weaponized for bad purposes doesn't disprove it. We could imagine a world where a state reacts to flat-earthers by executing their entire bloodline, for example, but that wouldn't make the earth any less round. It would warrant a critical examination of the round-earthers' beliefs, but we would still have to establish a logical connection for how believing in a round earth would cause someone to be more prone to doing stuff like that.
The only thing I said about Shinto is that it doesn't claim to make you a good person. That doesn't mean that I consider it "harmless" or "quaint." As I said, "That’s not to say that these belief systems cannot or should not be criticized."
Referencing the point I made above, we can easily connect Shinto to Japanese imperialism by pointing out the belief in the emperor's divinity. However, there's the question of, is imperial divinity an inherent aspect of Shinto? Traditionally, not really - poor farmers in feudal Japan barely knew who the emperor even was, and nowadays the emperor has explicitly denied being divine, but Shinto still exists. Does a widespread belief in mythological creatures make it easier for fascism to take root? Maybe, but then, fascism took root in Germany without such a belief (though the Nazis loved their mythology, tbf). It might be worthwhile to study how Shinto evolved, to see when and how it acquired a fascist character, and how it changed after WWII, in order to understand how fascism can make use of various belief systems and how those belief systems change in respone to fascism. Not only to better critique Shinto, but also to gain a better understanding of how fascists gain power.
My point is not to defend Shinto, which I have no investment in and I will happily agree is nonsense and bad, but to say that it's better to study and understand beliefs first, and then provide a more nuanced critique, rather than painting things with broad generalizations that are more relevant to the belief systems that you're more familiar with.
Atheism isn't a belief system, it's neither right or wrong, it's just the correct set of beliefs that magic isn't real? Is there a difference between a set of beliefs and a belief system? Is there a difference between being "right or wrong" vs being supported or unsupported by reason and evidence? I don't understand what you mean at all.
I personally am a Catholic, I don't hold an anti-theist position. I just wanted to point out to space_comerad that they were really not thinking through their position, there's nothing unique to Abrahamic faiths in their failures. If the criticism of Christianity is that it has been used to oppress people, then that critique must be held to every one of these faiths.
I see, fair enough.
uhh you know about the thing, right ?
That's understandable. My genuine take is that belief in a benevolent higher power is an insult to the countless people suffering every day that will never get reprieve and eventually die after a life of suffering
(but all of that said I'm not actually into the idea of stopping people from being religious)
Lots of those suffering people find solace in such ideas whether we like it or not. It can't be all bad.
It can be bad if that faith that help is on the way is entirely misplaced. No amount of prayer will lift someone from the conditions that led to their suffering
Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, the hadith outlines the story of a Bedouin man who was leaving his camel without tying it. The Prophet (PBUH) asked him “Why don’t you tie down your camel?” The Bedouin answered, “I put my trust in Allah.” The Prophet then replied, “Tie your camel first, and then put your trust in Allah.”
Kinda disagree with Marx on that one. I think religion is here to stay for a while even after achieving communism, it's gonna become much less important for sure but the concept isn't going anywhere as long as there are still unanswered questions in science.
It's really sicko shit. "Just world" is one of the most harmful beliefs in history.
Honestly the older I get the more my feelings of annoyance start to extend to astrology and crystals and wicca, etc. Like with that neo-spirituality stuff you don't even have the excuse of being indoctrinated into it, you willingly sold your soul to a chunk of quartz
It's very uncomfortable finding yourself in a situation where people are treating magic as a serious topic. Your options are basically "dissemble to keep the peace" or "admit that you think the whole thing is absurd and you consider the rest of the company gullible and a little pathetic." At least with casual discussions of astrology you can just ask people about their lives without actually engaging with the magic component. When people start talking about "manifesting" shit I turn green and leave the room.
God is real and I am building a sandwich big enough that he'll choke on it.
God is real but he's the bad one, hail satan 😈
Nurgle is definitely real, how else is covid winning so hard complete with cultists (antivaxx/anti lockdown people) :think-mark:
Best case scenario I'm getting dragged into some supernatural dickhead's social order, worst case scenario i'm getting dragged into a bunch of grifters using some supernatural dickhead as a hand puppet's social order, and i don't really want either. The (very convenient for them) threat of eternal punishment be damned, only way i'm doing this is my way
deleted by creator