• HoChiMaxh [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hot take: it’s a white saviour narrative.

    The other criticism is they cast non-indigenous actors as Na’Vi, which is like fine obviously gulag white people but is kind of a weird criticism I think. Like the Na’Vi aren’t actually indigenous characters, but :shrug-outta-hecks:

    They do mention in the article that an activist made a post on indigenous-made sci-fi flicks which is cool, even though several aren’t sci-fi flicks comrades should check the list out anyways there’s some good stuff in there.

    • flan [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hot take: it’s a white saviour narrative.

      the entire story is a white guy who puts on his vr helmet and saves the natives

      • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think that’s the entire story comrade but ok

        • flan [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          i havent seen the second one but that was the first one in a nutshell

          • blobjim [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I mean he literally kills his white body at the end of the first one.

            • AcidSmiley [she/her]
              ·
              2 years ago

              It's part of the trope that the white savior is absolved of being a bleach demon so the audience doesn't have to confront their own complicity in racist structures. White savior narratives aren't a problem because they show mayos joining an emancipatory cause, that's fine and good, actually. They are problematic because they still center the colonizer's perspective, do not make a white audience challenge their own role in racist and colonial systems, rob nonwhite people of agency and present benevolent white people as the only way forward for oppressed racialized groups. The first Avatar hits all of these notes and if Way of Water still has Jake Sully as the protagonist, i don't see it changing anything about that.

              That doesn't make Avatar a bad franchise leftists aren't allowed to enjoy, i really liked the first one and will watch Way of Water the way James Cameron intended (as a camrip on my phone with a pokeball burned into the cracked display).

              It just means that as a big holiday blockbuster movie following established hollywood narrative structures, it has problematic ways of telling a story about imperialism that should be pointed out. If we do not do that and engage with the subject honestly and critically, such stories maintain the systems they are criticizing instead of challenging them. Doesn't mean that you and me aren't allowed to cheer for Sully saving space whales or w/e, just means that we should take a step back afterwards and reflect on what we've seen.

              • BeamBrain [he/him]
                hexagon
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yeah, I think the movie would have been better if Jake had helped the Na'vi by doing things like smuggling them weapons and feeding them intel rather than being better at blue cat things than all the blue cat people.

                • AcidSmiley [she/her]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Real missed opportunity to do a Ho Chi Minh path and a Battle of Dien Bien Phu as well. Honestly, the earthers have been there since forever, i already would've given the na'vi rifles adapted for their physique at the very beginning.

            • kristina [she/her]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              i mean i would too for myself its defective gimme that 10 foot tall blue booty :crazy-frog-trans:

              • blobjim [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                It's like yeah it's a white savior movie but it's also the best white savior movie ever made. He's also barely even in the scene where they're killing the Americans, and he doesn't kill the main bad guy either. So the main "white savior" thing he does is unite the different Na'vi groups. I think people focusing on the white savior aspect of it get boosted because people would rather not hear the anti-US message of the movie.

                There's so many random criticisms of these movies that you don't hear about anything else. People being like "Avatar is just a hippie dippie environmental movie" even though there's only one scene that really references that. That it's a white savior movie, that it's this and that... The POINT of the movie is that the white supremacists are unmistakably the bad guys. People should be pointing that out more. Is it such a sin that the white guy who is "one of the good ones" has such a central role?

    • ElHexo
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

        • geikei [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Usualy thats metaphorical and the MC can just continue their life as the white guy colonizer anytime

      • BowlingForDeez [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Simón Bolívar wasn't mixed race at all, he was a criollo which means he was European ancestry born in the Americas. The Bolívar family was one of the wealthiest in the colonies. Criollos led the revolution against Peninsulares, who were Spanish people born in Spain. While indigenous and mestizo people were essential to the Bolivarian revolution, the criollo class led the revolution and formed the successor states to preserve Criollo wealth and status.

    • geikei [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Almost all Na'vi are played by non white people. The avatars that were white people to begin with or are kids of white people Avatars are played by white people

      • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        TIL, thanks. To be fair to the argument they didn’t say white actors in the article, that was me editorializing - they used the term non-indigenous actors.

  • blobjim [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    She said her organization IllumiNative, which aims to improve media portrayals of Indigenous people, is in talks with Disney on how the “Avatar” franchise might avoid similar pitfalls in its third installment, set to release 2024.

    kinda lol though. The rest of it may be valid, but this part is just a grift.

    edit: She's probably gonna get them to redo half the movie and Disney will force the artists and actors to crunch and be miserable an entire year xD And the third one will somehow be about how the United States is actually Good™ and helping the Na'vi and the bad guys were actually just a rogue splinter faction. All clear guys phew! Call me ridiculously cynical. I'm kind of paranoid that there's a lot of people and institutions kinda out to get this movie because of the fact that it is anti-imperialist and portrays Americans negatively.

    • ElHexo
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • YoloParenti [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah "is in talks with Disney..." is code for "is soliciting a contract with Disney..." Plus, principal photography wrapped in 2020, and IllumiNative can do the most/best work in preproduction. I'd think it's too late?

      • kristina [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        can we talk about how this company has illuminati in its name though lmfao

  • kristina [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    hair sex, throw in some vaguely indigenous pipe sounds in to get the mood goin

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I remember similar complaints about it from Native Americans with the first one, but they also appreciated aspects of it.

  • DoghouseCharlie [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is the Avatar that dude takes over in the first movie like a real Avatar or somehow synthetically made, how's that work? It sounds like some Get Out sorta thing.