From what I saw, the previous reboot was fine, even if it made the supernatural more directly "real" consistently which is a significant thematic change from the older shows.
It's too bad that :frothingfash: vomiting :us-foreign-policy: tantrums everywhere will make any non-chud criticism of the most recent show almost impossible without being associated with the :frothingfash: , but maybe that is the point.
From what I read about it, it seems to be a le drugs (as in, no more Shaggy "snacks" subtleties) and le sex pestery edgy reboot that it seems no one asked for and no one wanted, but because it pressed the right chud provocations button it has protection from criticism.
Are you saying that adults are only allowed to consume arbitrarily selected "adult" shows or else they are "useless" to you?
Where are the minimum required standards of blood, gore, and sexual violence posted?
That's literally what the new show is, apparently Scooby Doo isn't even in it
Oh my. I guess that counts as trying something new.
No. I am not saying that.
Then what are you saying?
It is a waste of time for adults to watch a kids show and get mad that it doesn’t cater to them.
I don't think a show that is marketing itself as a darker and edgier Scooby Doo with direct drug references and sex pest jokes about Fred is really intended specifically for children.
Getting mad at what you perceive as getting mad is still getting mad. You're not above this.
I didn’t know it did all that. I assumed it was for children because it is Scooby Doo. I apologise.