From what I saw, the previous reboot was fine, even if it made the supernatural more directly "real" consistently which is a significant thematic change from the older shows.

It's too bad that :frothingfash: vomiting :us-foreign-policy: tantrums everywhere will make any non-chud criticism of the most recent show almost impossible without being associated with the :frothingfash: , but maybe that is the point.

From what I read about it, it seems to be a le drugs (as in, no more Shaggy "snacks" subtleties) and le sex pestery edgy reboot that it seems no one asked for and no one wanted, but because it pressed the right chud provocations button it has protection from criticism.

  • JohnBrownsBussy [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think you're thinking of Scooby Doo! Mystery Incorporated, but there was two other Scooby-Doo shows in between that and Velma (Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! and Scooby-Doo and Guess Who?)

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      There were more reboots and relaunches than I previously thought. :surprised-pika:

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          I lost track of how many times Spider-Man was rebooted. I got sooooo sick and tired of origin stories and that lead to me quitting capeshit entirely.

          • ssjmarx [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Scooby Doo never really goes off the air. At this point it's a cultural institution not unlike the Simpsons - but while that show has tried over the years to hide the seams created by changing producers, writers, artists etc, the Scoobyverse embraces those seams, creating spinoff after spinoff and every time one show ends replacing it with another that's usually coming at the material from a completely different direction from the previous version.

            And they're mostly shit.

    • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I didn't watch more than a few episodes of Be Cool, Scooby Doo! but I liked how they changed Daphne's character into a goofy stoner girl as a contemporary to Shaggy

      Her old characterization as a damsel in distress or rich girl was always the low point of the gang and this version of Daphne reminded me of some actual girls who smoke weed that I've known, plus she was funny

      Mystery Incorporated was of course the GOAT

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What I want to know is why people keep rebooting and modernising something that clearly is supposed to stay in the 70s

  • Bloobish [comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Scooby Doo is eternal and shall be remade and rebooted until the sun itself smolders into ash...

  • jaqingoff [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have not seen any Scooby Doo or Tom and Jerry since I was a child. These are children’s shows for children.

    Why are useless adults getting mad? Let the children enjoy them.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I have not seen any Scooby Doo or Tom and Jerry since I was a child. These are children’s shows for children.

      Why are useless adults getting mad? Let the children enjoy them.

      Are you saying that adults are only allowed to consume arbitrarily selected "adult" shows or else they are "useless" to you?

      Where are the minimum required standards of blood, gore, and sexual violence posted?

      • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Are you saying that adults are only allowed to consume arbitrarily selected “adult” shows or else they are “useless” to you?

        That's literally what the new show is, apparently Scooby Doo isn't even in it

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          apparently Scooby Doo isn’t even in it

          Oh my. I guess that counts as trying something new.

          • jaqingoff [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It is a waste of time for adults to watch a kids show and get mad that it doesn’t cater to them.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I don't think a show that is marketing itself as a darker and edgier Scooby Doo with direct drug references and sex pest jokes about Fred is really intended specifically for children.

              Getting mad at what you perceive as getting mad is still getting mad. You're not above this.

              • jaqingoff [none/use name]
                ·
                2 years ago

                I didn’t know it did all that. I assumed it was for children because it is Scooby Doo. I apologise.

  • DoghouseCharlie [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    They reboot it all the time. I remember one of the ones they did right before the one they did that had the Family Guy art style was pretty good, but it's a pain to figure out which exact reboot that was.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      Family Guy art style

      :lea-why:

      Though, to be fair, Lower Decks used a Rick and Morty art style and somehow I enjoyed Lower Decks a lot while hating Rick and Morty, so that isn't automatically a red flag I suppose.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anyone remember A Pup Named Scooby-Doo? That shit rocked. The OG was dope as well. 13 Ghosts had Vincent Price but no finale. Scrappy is bad but Flim Flam is next level awful.

  • ChestRockwell [comrade/them, any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is the kind of liberalism I hate the most (diversity in shitty content) because it's hard to critique on the merits. At least things like queer POC CIA operatives are fairly straightforward to critique (I hate all CIA operatives and the CIA is bad no matter who's there), but when it comes to art the additional subjectivity makes things harder.

    I still haven't watched and probably won't unless comrades here make a strong case.

    :zizek:

  • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s too bad that vomiting tantrums everywhere will make any non-chud criticism of the most recent show almost impossible without being associated with the

    Honestly I've seen way more ostensibly left wing people who have a beef with Mindy Kaling than chuds.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      I only found out about that today. The usual pattern for these kinds of shows that do a little politics as a treat :us-foreign-policy: is chuds hating them for that and pretty much ignoring the rest of the show's content.

      From what I've learned about Mindy Kaling today, I think those left wing people may have some plausible reasons to dislike her.

  • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    There was a 3D Scooby movie that had some brand of brown Velma a couple years ago. At least I think... I looked up "Scoob!" and that Velma is voiced by Gina Rodriguez but doesn't look as brown as I remember.

    Now I feel like I'm in a time warp, fuck.

  • YourFavoriteFed [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well, I sat down and watched the damn thing. I regret even half-defending it to own the cons. :what-the-hell:

    But yeah, Scooby-Doo is just one of those things that's going to get rebooted over and over, kinda like Star Wars or Tom & Jerry: Some will hit and some will miss, such is life. In a perfect world, something like that would be made public domain.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Did it stay just as bad as it started, or get worse?

      There's a sort of "woke edgy" that liberals tend to produce, write, and direct, and it seems intentionally designed to piss as many people off as possible as a publicity gimmick. Star Trek Picard comes to mind. It's got plenty :us-foreign-policy: to piss off chuds but it's also a pointlessly grimdark and arbitrarily cruel misery parade with false sentimentality and hypocritical moralizing that the show itself can't even maintain or adhere to.