Well Russians were boasting it was gonna be over by summer 2022 or whatever so it's definitely not all going according to plan. I agree that long term Ukraine doesn't have a chance but it's harder than the Russians were expecting for sure.
Russian randos. Never saw official Russian government sources claiming it was all gonna be over by summer. Stop taking the claims of random Russian commenters so seriously as if they have any extra knowledge or power
The Ukrainians are now admitting that the hammer is about to fall on them
The UA Defence Minister (Reznikov) who gave that quote about a 500k strong spring offensive has a poor track record of telling the truth. He recently claimed that Russia was covertly launching a second wave of mobilization, despite no such thing happening, and is often in the news hyping up the threat of Russian forces as a justification for why Ukraine needs more western weapons.
500 thousand is going to be the approximate number of all Russian forces deployed to Ukraine after all conscripts are trained, and there is no way all of them are going to launch an attack at once. Both because it'd be stupid and because the actual number of soldiers available for any offensive will be significantly lower than the total given the need to maintain reserves and defend.
Maybe the spring will bring a Russian capture of Bahkmut and further gains in the Kramatorsk/Slovyansk direction, but most accounts of the ongoing fighting makes it seem more likely that we'll see a continuation of the World War 1 style trench warfare than anything like an Operation Bagration. Regardless, if Russian leadership think the strategic defeat of the Ukrainian Army is imminent their relatively modest and conciliatory statements regarding peace don't show it.
Destroying the Ukrainian army and inducing their government into unconditional surrendering is by far and away the most humiliating outcome for the west and beneficial for Russia. If Russia had the capacity to do that in the next few months, I can't see any reason why they wouldn't as I don't think the prospects of blowing up a few Leopards and F-16s in the future is worth continuing a costly and destructive war.
Destroying the Ukrainian army and inducing their government into unconditional surrendering is by far and away the most humiliating outcome for the west and beneficial for Russia..
It really isn't. Say tomorrow the Russians just annihilate the Ukrainian army and waltz into Kiev. Congratulations, you've won a decades long insurgency!
deleted by creator
Well Russians were boasting it was gonna be over by summer 2022 or whatever so it's definitely not all going according to plan. I agree that long term Ukraine doesn't have a chance but it's harder than the Russians were expecting for sure.
Russian randos. Never saw official Russian government sources claiming it was all gonna be over by summer. Stop taking the claims of random Russian commenters so seriously as if they have any extra knowledge or power
Pretty sure there were pretty high up people claiming that. Might be misremembering can't really find any sources from a few minutes of googling.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
don't they say that every other week
deleted by creator
Nah, they usually brag about how Putler is about to run out of missiles or how some overengineered wunderwaffe from Burgerland will turn the tide.
deleted by creator
The UA Defence Minister (Reznikov) who gave that quote about a 500k strong spring offensive has a poor track record of telling the truth. He recently claimed that Russia was covertly launching a second wave of mobilization, despite no such thing happening, and is often in the news hyping up the threat of Russian forces as a justification for why Ukraine needs more western weapons.
500 thousand is going to be the approximate number of all Russian forces deployed to Ukraine after all conscripts are trained, and there is no way all of them are going to launch an attack at once. Both because it'd be stupid and because the actual number of soldiers available for any offensive will be significantly lower than the total given the need to maintain reserves and defend.
Maybe the spring will bring a Russian capture of Bahkmut and further gains in the Kramatorsk/Slovyansk direction, but most accounts of the ongoing fighting makes it seem more likely that we'll see a continuation of the World War 1 style trench warfare than anything like an Operation Bagration. Regardless, if Russian leadership think the strategic defeat of the Ukrainian Army is imminent their relatively modest and conciliatory statements regarding peace don't show it.
deleted by creator
Destroying the Ukrainian army and inducing their government into unconditional surrendering is by far and away the most humiliating outcome for the west and beneficial for Russia. If Russia had the capacity to do that in the next few months, I can't see any reason why they wouldn't as I don't think the prospects of blowing up a few Leopards and F-16s in the future is worth continuing a costly and destructive war.
deleted by creator
It really isn't. Say tomorrow the Russians just annihilate the Ukrainian army and waltz into Kiev. Congratulations, you've won a decades long insurgency!
deleted by creator