Image is of Wang Yi, Member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and Director of the Office of the Central Commission for Foreign Affairs, delivering a speech at the Munich Security Conference in 2023.
China has put forward a quite general peace proposal, which I imagine is both for Ukraine and also meant to be a general guide for solving conflicts in the future, with 12 points. Unfortunately it has no lobsters, nor dragons of chaos.
These 12 points are, as follows: respect the sovereignty of all countries and all countries are equal; abandon Cold War mentalities; cease hostilities; resume peace talks; resolve humanitarian crises; protect civilians and POWs; keep nuclear power plants safe (what a jab!); reduce strategic risks (that is, nuclear war); facilitate grain exports; stop unilateral sanctions; keep industrial and supply chains stable - the economy is not a weapon; and promote post-conflict reconstruction.
TeleSUR goes into more depth on each point for those interested.
Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.
Here is the archive of important pieces of analysis from throughout the war that we've collected.
February 27th's update is here on the site and here in the comments.
February 28th's update is here on the site and here in the comments.
March 1st's update is here on the site and here in the comments.
March 3rd's update is here in the comments.
March 4th's update is here in the comments.
Links and Stuff
American anti-war rally on March 18th by left groups!
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Add to the above list if you can, thank you.
Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. I recommend their map more than the channel at this point, as an increasing subscriber count has greatly diminished their quality.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have good analysis (though also a couple bad takes here and there)
Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources. Beware of chuddery.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are fairly brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. The Duran, of which he co-hosts, is where the chuddery really begins to spill out.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the Ukrainian warzones.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Telegram Channels
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ Gleb Bazov, banned from Twitter, referenced pretty heavily in what remains of pro-Russian Twitter.
https://t.me/asbmil ~ Now rebranded as Battlefield Insights, they do infrequent posts on the conflict.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/riafan_everywhere ~ Think it's a government news org or Federal News Agency? Russian language.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Front news coverage. Russian langauge.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of the really big pro-Russian (except when they're being pessismistic, which is often) telegram channels focussing on the war. Russian language.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine
Any Western media outlet that is even vaguely liberal (and quite a few conservative ones too).
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Last week's discussion post.
I suppose it would make sense to push to the Oskil river and make that your first line of defense (with the latter ones being the already created one on the Kremmina-Svatovo line). I don't know if there's much value in continuing much further west than that, though pivoting southwards is probably necessary if they wanna take Slovyansk-Kramatorsk in a timely manner once Bakhmut is tidied up.
idk. i'm a geologist, not a general. did you know that there's an ancient rifting zone here created over 250 million years ago by a mantle plume (similar to what's under Hawaii), ranging from about Pripyat to the southeastern edge of Donetsk Oblast. this became a basin and was later flooded and then waters receded and from what I can gather, that's why there's so much salt in Soledar and coal resources in general. the volcanism is probably also responsible for the iron veins, I'm not sure, I'd have to do more research tbh
I hadn’t realized you were a geologist… the other day someone was asking about all the new lithium discoveries… is it the case that people basically know what parts of the crust contain lithium and it’s just a matter of finding the vein? How many more “largest ever” deposits should we expect?
@cynesthesia's response is pretty informative on the more economic side of things.
My exact field isn't this and it's been a little while since I took courses on it, but for lithium in particular, there's two ways of getting it: from brines (that is, water which has very high amounts of salt in it, where "salt" isn't just meant as the usual 'sodium chloride' but also as lithium and potassium salts, etc), and from solid rock minerals, spodumene being one of bigger ones economically. Brines are much easier to harvest the lithium from, so that's been the focus of lithium mining for decades. This is the situation in the Lithium Triangle in South America, as well as in parts of China. Processing the lithium from solid ore is more energy-intensive and thus costly, but if the concentration (called the "grade" in geology) is high enough then it can be worth it, and spodumene mining is what Australia does as they have high-grade ore. Why exactly this has happened is interesting and beyond me a little; as cynesthesia mentioned, it's surprising how fast Australian mining has come online in only the last decade.
More generally, ores can form in a few different ways. The most common way (or, at least, the way I was taught; as I said, it's been a while) happens alongside the formation of igneous rocks, which happens at plate boundaries and/or volcanoes. One way it happens is that, in a magma chamber for example, a mineral will crystallize (that is, solidify or freeze) at a higher temperature than the rest of the molten rock in the chamber, and that mineral will then be set in stone, pun intended, and settle at the bottom of the chamber while the molten rock floats above it. So when the whole chamber eventually freezes over, when volcanic activity ends, which could take many millions of years, you end up with a layer of a certain mineral, and that mineral may or may not be useful to you depending on what it contains. Another way that it happens is at the end of a magma's "life", when its reaching low temperatures and close to freezing, what's typically left over is the "rejects" that couldn't fit with the rest of the elements in the magma. It's quite low-viscosity for a magma, AKA it's able to flow quite easily, and so it can spread and inject itself into preexisting rock already in the area, and then it finally freezes and a rock called a pegmatite is formed. Now, many pegmatites will be quite boring and contain regular, boring elements, but a few of them can concentrate rarer elements like lithium. Spodumene and other lithium minerals are typically found in pegmatites.
So if you're looking for lithium ore, what you will probably wanna do is a) find a geological location that has shown to have some kind of magmatic activity in the distant past (and these can be all over the world; the planet has had a LONG history), b) search for pegmatite formation, and c) take samples of it and determine what the pegmatite contains. I assume there's a similar process for searching for brines. The problem isn't finding lithium or even minerals that contain specific elements in general per se, they're kinda everywhere; it's finding ores that have sufficient grade to make them economical to mine, and are close enough to the surface that you don't have to dig a whole bunch to get them.
And, to go off on a complete tangent, rare earth elements for example aren't actually that rare all things considered, there's actually been deposits found all over the world AFAIK, the reason that China has a massive production of them is actually because of :deng-smile:. From this article from sciencehistory:
But in 2010 there was an incident between Japan and China, and China began restricting exports of rare earth elements:
So China played the economic game well, knowing that the neoliberals would neolib, and they've hated China for it ever since. This is a glimpse into what could happen if the West tries the sanctions war on China. But it'll take many years to set up profitable rare earth mines even if the war started tomorrow, and what might happen instead is that the rare earths will go through middlemen to the West, causing them to pay higher prices (and for the middlemen to get rich), kinda like what we're seeing with Russian oil.
Economic geology is quite a political game. It always has been; a century ago it was oil that propelled the desperate Nazis to invade the Soviets, and this time, it might be rare earths and lithium that propel the United States to invade China and South America.
Sorry, this got long. I should write a post on this at some point.
This was excellent, thank you. I’m 100% here for more geology posting, especially with the global context you and @cynesthesia are providing. I know Gallium is used in radars and some other electronics, what’s the deal with that? I think looking at the relationships between the earth and global power structures is really interesting and bound to be informative and maybe even predictive. Talk about material analysis!
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
In many ways the Silmarillion is about geology.
deleted by creator
seconding that this needs its own post
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I'm reading more on it and I feel like this is something I'd need a textbook to understand fully, but I think the order of events is that the rift was forming 500 million years ago or so and continued to do so for the next couple hundred millions of years, but it was the failed arm of a triple junction. Then the Variscan orogeny came along and this resulted in further synclinal structures as the crust buckled (so the Azov Uplands are perhaps the eroded remains of some of the mountains formed during that orogeny?). There was further volcanic activity in the area due to the orogeny, and the synclines flooded in the Middle Devonian, forming basins, then the waters eventually retreated, came back, retreated, etc until the glaciers covered the area and eroded it closer to the modern day, which is probably why the country is so flat in places, and here we are today.