• Lester_Peterson [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The PRC's the only Nuclear-armed country with an unconditional 'No First Use' policy, meaning they alone pledge to never launch a first strike (even in the event of an invasion) and to never use their nukes to threaten other countries into submission. They are, quite clearly, the single country whose Nukes should worry you the least.

    • Vampire [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Words are meaningless in great power politics.

      • Lester_Peterson [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The reason why no other country has committed themselves to a NFU policy is because of how meaningful words are in international relations. Russia and the U.S.have been no stranger to the use of the implied threat of nuclear war in the pursuit of their own interests. The Cuban missile crisis, for instance, had America very openly stating their willingness to bring about Armageddon if the Soviets didn't listed to their demands, and they were never even threatened with invasion.

        By contrast, even the most bellicose of Chinese politicians have refused to bring up their country's arsenal of ICBM's when threatened, and that is a very deliberate choice because they could very easily do so on many occasions, particularly with regards to Taiwan. Moreover, NFU commitments have had a very material effect upon Chinese Nuclear policy. Because of it them the PRC never joined the Cold War Nuclear Arms race and even today China lacks anything like the first-strike capabilities of the U.S. and Russia.

      • Shoegazer [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        True but history has shown they’ve only invaded another country once and pulled covert shit against communists in others. It’s unlikely they’re going to be the one starting any war these days

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          they are worth a little America has on multiple occasions almost launched nulear weapons by accident once when US soldiers mistook the moon for a soviet missile

  • FoolishFool [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The U.S. is like a guy who's openly shot someone twice, and has stockpiled a mountain of guns ever since, whining about other people who have never shot anyone doing the same to not end up like the shot guy.

  • AHopeOnceMore [he/him]B
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Hey look it's the news outlet started by the founder of the Proud Boys.

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    This isn't even good cold war propaganda. The empire can't even do that right anymore!

    When your audience are imbeciles, why bother putting in the effort.

    • Teekeeus
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • Vampire [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Everybody's nukes are worrisome. When elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers. Having said that, China is a smaller nuclear power than Russia and the USA

  • Teekeeus
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • GaveUp [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    If it works it's good. The propaganda is plenty good enough

  • Shoegazer [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Didn’t they make like 5 of these videos? I’m more worried about the US pulling some shit and china rightfully responding with a nuke.

  • Staines [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    It's possible China will massively expand their nuclear arsenal.

    Most of China's weapons are only capable of hitting US regional thralls like south korea, japan, australia. As the US increasingly ramps up tensions and increasingly seems to care less and less about their "allies", China may need to make sure it has sufficient numbers of silo-based ICBM's that can hit the US mainland. Problem is, silos are vulnerable to first strikes, so they'd need enough to destroy the world "several times over" in order to ensure they can at least destroy the USA once over with what they have left in a second strike.

    If China was closer to the US, it might get away with maintaining a small second-strike MRBM capable force.

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Ditch silos and use submarines. No first strike capability against them and range is a non-issue.