Not even true even in their limited liberal view if the world. The Iranian nuclear agreement for starters, Minsk II, treaties become obsolete due to changing circumstances all the time as well. Guy just thinks invoking a latin phrase makes international relations more sacred, but it's not- at all. There are no rules between nations.
There's a reason why academic jurists have had a debate over whether international law can actually be considered law in the first place as it is rarely enforced, is often impossible for anyone to enforce and when it is that enforcement is wildly inconsistent.
Not even true even in their limited liberal view if the world. The Iranian nuclear agreement for starters, Minsk II, treaties become obsolete due to changing circumstances all the time as well. Guy just thinks invoking a latin phrase makes international relations more sacred, but it's not- at all. There are no rules between nations.
There's a reason why academic jurists have had a debate over whether international law can actually be considered law in the first place as it is rarely enforced, is often impossible for anyone to enforce and when it is that enforcement is wildly inconsistent.
And a big "no it's really law" argument is that most laws are enforced unevenly, so how is this so different?
:thinking-about-it: