Isekai was a thing before the word was popularized and normalized in the west to describe the subgenre of fantasy. I'd argue The Neverending Story is clearly an isekai, for example. And there's been great conventional anime isekais in the past, such as Vision of Escaflowne.
What I'm sick of is the "oh this is like a video game and the NPCs can be manipulated because they're just programs susceptible to cheat codes" gimmick. It's gross and I find it intolerable to follow any "hero" that dehumanizes other characters under any excuse to build a virtual capitalist empire with an infinite harem. It's :epstein: tier :brainworms: to me.
I don't want to automatically reject something I hear about because I hear it's an "isekai" but all too often it means "another video game world with NPCs to exploit!" :capitalist-laugh:
What an empty sort of metagamey victory to fantasize about. How alienating and sad for such "heroes," even if they still deserve :gulag: in general.
deleted by creator
Contrary to what some think of me here, I really don't say a story can't have such elements. To me the difference is intention and presentation.
Lots of bad things can be talked about, even shown with some tact and sympathy for the afflicted, or it can instead focus on gratuitous fanservice and edge/shock value.
Thanks for the additional information.
deleted by creator
No no, you're fine here and I didn't pick up that tone. Rather, I was nodding to what you said and applying it to the wider context of what we were discussing. I do think it's possible to have bad people do bad things in fiction without it being crass and cynical hogfeed.
Noted.