bully him mercilessly cos obviously he needs it.
Commenter claiming Iraq war prevented ww3 and saved Europe from Russia:michael-laugh:
well, they got their war by making up lies about WMDs, why not justify the murder of civilians by making up even more fantasy shit about ww3?
Two can play at that game
Uhhh the colonial occupation of the Philippines prevented Mussolini from obtaining satellite weaponry
The internet has embolden nerds who otherwise would flinch when you raise your fist
Saying people are doing "whataboutism" or any other fallacy without justifying the accusation is a bare assertion fallacy. If they do not provide justification for their accusation of fallacy within ~30 seconds, you can legally kill them and take any belongings they have on their person.
Telling me I'm doing a fallacy after I've told you your doing a fallacy is whataboutery actually sooo youre owned. :so-true:
A radlib friend who I've known for years came to debate me on one of my fb posts, and he just kept saying stuff like "red herring fallacy" and "no true Scotsman". It was honestly kinda sad.
He called the other user a "trollbot" who "can't speak English fluently". Lmao
How about avoiding thought-terminating cliches, you brain-wormed little chicken shit coward, and answer the fucking question.
(I'd have said it to them, but I don't have a working reddit account and even if I made a new one, I'm sure my comment wouldn't go through without any "karma".)
Worst is when they claim you did an ad hominem and it negates everything you say because you decide to dunk on them after exhausting through all their other points, and then you spend like 3 replies explaining to them thats not how ad hominems work and also you're a dweeb for trying to claim one at all. I gotta log off.
