People are sleeping on how much damage Joe Biden has done outside of goofy shit that chuds think like him being a satanist. This old fart is literally instigating nuclear war.
way too many people with little to no memory of the cold war. i was basically born too late for all but the absolute tail end of it and i was an anxious kid and obsessed over all things nuclear war. so i can only imagine the average person.
For the boomers in charge who remember the cold war I have to ask, are you okay with this? To which it's "yes" because China and Russia hate us for our freedumbs.
you ever think their lead poisoned brains may be confusing like actual traumatic events they remembered from that time with movies and stuff?
Same anxious kid here. Born in 1979, and I clearly remember learning about the possibility of nuclear armageddon when I was like 6 and not being able to sleep properly for like 3 weeks after.
And here I am like 30 years later seeing libs going "bring it on, it's totally worth it".
Feel like I'm losing my mind.
:soypoint-1: :nuke: :soypoint-2:
Western journalists: "fFUCK YES I'M GONNA CUM"
So many unhinged libs on the internet who are literally okay with nuclear war if it means fucking over Russia/China. I mean, I doubt they'd keep thinking that after it happened, but still.
I swear these fucking people think "well we nuked Japan and that was le reddit wholesome chungus 100 why not just keep doing it" because of the massive campaign to rewrite history so that dropping the nukes was actually good
Turns out when you spend 100 years lying about how some of the worst crimes ever committed on earth were actually good people start wanting to commit even worse crimes
The main difference between the USA and Nazi Germany's crimes is that the USA was able to complete its genocidal expansionism.
If the Other Side did this, every newspaper would be clamoring for strategic bombings of population centers to show we're not weak
Is this supposed to be a serious threat? Isn't our nuclear doctrine nowadays ICBMs + subs?
The nuclear triad is bombers + ICBMs + submarines, there's an idea that you need to have all three in order to properly threaten MAD, though I think North Korea has proven by now that the only really relevant one is ICBMs since that's the only one that can't be meaningfully defended against.
I think the DPRK's strategic calculus is different because it's never trying to use its nuclear capability as an umbrella for some other foreign policy adventure (like Russia is doing now and which the USA and USSR did during the Cold War).
The DPRK only wants to be left alone and therefore only needs enough capabilities to make the other side think that it's not worth the risk. Hypothetically, if the DPRK was only able to wipe LA off the map before being destroyed, that might be enough to get the US to reconsider fucking with the DPRK since it just wants to be left alone.
On the other hand, if the US thought that it could destroy Russia or China with the loss of only LA, the ghouls in DC might think the trade is worthwhile and try it. That's why major rival powers like Russia and China need more weapons, more delivery systems, and diverse delivery capabilities that are more likely to survive a first strike against them.
