OnlyFans girls better make money faster now before the AI thing starts really breaking boundaries.

yes, easy money will dry up fast

:reddit-logo:

that's the average hot girl on onlyfans. Those kids who pay for those subscriptions have no clue these girls are fucking somebody, and that somebody is likely their pimp or boyfriend managing their accounts.

Kids are clueless about the sex industry and fell into a fantasy that they are "fans". No, they are the prey these girls get rich on. Imagine paying for some text messages. Jesus, get an escort and at least fuck her. What the heck is wrong with people?

:reddit-logo: moment

Wow it even included the cameltoe. What a fascinating modern age we live in.

:reddit-logo:

AI girls 3000% hotter than actual girls damn. sexual singularity is upon us

:reddit-logo:

Another industry destroyed? 100% ethical AI generated porn...

Will it be ethical to create porn in the likeness of Emma Watson, or a personal unreciprocated crush?

Emma Watson was my first celebrity boner. I'm personally not going to make hideous vanilla porn. Instead I'm going to roleplay with her in ChatGPT or Claude. In future, she will be my wife in full dive VR world.

:reddit-logo: :stalin-gun-1: :volcel-judge:

That very last one was the thread's OP.

  • Tommasi [she/her, pup/pup's]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everything in the video is identical to the source except they gave the woman a different face and body lol, these commenters acting like AI made this from scratch.

    Also, the incel trope of OnlyFans being just incredbly easy money kinda grinds my gears. It's like every other online content platform like YouTube, Twitch eg. in that there's gonna be a tiny part of success stories racking in cash while the average creator is gonna make next to nothing. The average woman can't just decide to start an onlyfans and become rich.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      Everything in the video is identical to the source except they gave the woman a different face and body lol, these commenters acting like AI made this from scratch.

      Yeah, it's basically just a fancy yet shitty rotoscoping filter and they're all :awooga:ing their minds over it.

    • FlakesBongler [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, it's not like I could just start up an OnlyFans and start raking it in

      You gotta advertise to get yourself out there and that costs money

      You have to figure out a niche to fill (angry bisexual lumberjack in my situation) and that's not always a sure sign of success

      You basically have to already have the time and resources to make money off of OnlyFans and that's so far out of the reach of the average person that it's actually kind of sad

  • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Can't wait for the brave new world where all artistic and intellectual content that used to be made by humans is instead generated on server farms owned by a handful of rich people

    Like where do these goobers see themselves benefiting from this arrangement? You can't run this shit on your laptop

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    ... So....

    Is anyone else weirded out that people commenting on this aren't weirded out by the horrifying uncanny valley... thing going on in that video?

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is seriously creepy as shit that people don't find these creepy as shit. They'll be crowing about how good it looks and it's like "am I the only one seeing half of an extra arm sticking out at a weird angle?"

    • FourteenEyes [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Are you under the assumption they've seen a real woman or something

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • Avanash [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t really experience the uncanny valley. If anything, stuff that makes other people uncomfortable in that way tends to evoke novelty for me.

    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Artistic people are less susceptible to that effect. Which given that it a porn reddit tracks with expectstions

  • Grandpa_garbagio [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    We must dedicate all of humanities scarce resources to recreating pornography but significantly worse

  • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it's kinda weird that they changed the original model to be whiter and east asian looking. The face in particular is just uncanny valley.

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It also removed all the tattoos and somehow made the model have less bodyfat with a visible lower ribcage , and less visible abs. Like if someone is that lean they'd at least have a slightly visible four pack.

    • laziestflagellant [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      But that requires hundreds of hours if not years of effort (learning animation in specific programs, learning modeling if you want something more than an existing open source model), versus taking an existing porn video and running a glorfied snap chat filter over it (after all the other big minds have worked out all the practical issues involved wrt frame flickering and face tracking)

        • laziestflagellant [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I mean yeah there are thousands of little shortcuts for 3D animation made by many dedicated and talented people over the years but unless you're going to invest in a DIY Xbox Kinect motion capture setup and rawdog the mocap animation data of yourself or your friends air humping, you still gotta like... animate the sex yourself. And that part's hard! And without instant gratification!

    • Avanash [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Have you ever had the experience of going to a porn site, typing in a thing you’re in the mood for, and following the recommended videos until you were in some horny rabbit hole of content you’d never seen before? Imagine that, except it’s able to cater a video to your exact interests instantly without having to search or compromise on any of your individual preferences. And instead of recommended videos, it’ll be recommended prompts or recommended revisions to your current prompt, themselves generated by an algorithm that learns your preferences over time. Maybe it will remember characters and activities in between sessions so you’ll literally be faced with a lineup of your platonic ideal of a sexual partner every single time you’re horny, refined over time to become closer and closer to your ideal.

      This is the logical conclusion or AI porn. And the process can become even more immersive and efficient for premium users who have sex toys with sensors to report back how aroused they are and AR goggles with eye tracking. The telemetry possibilities are endless. Think TikTok style scrollable video porn

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • Avanash [they/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, unless companies can figure out how to give me a more balanced dose of brain chemicals, this shit isn’t sustainable.

        • Avanash [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Discovery is a very big part of algorithmic design, so I think developing new tastes won’t be out of the question. But those tastes will tends towards more misogynistic and attention grabbing for sure.

          I could definitely imagine a world where social interaction is seen as a physical need that we fill via consumption like we already do with food in the west. So these AI options could be a way to express and fulfill personal taste. The goal is to eat better food, not to share that experience with more people.

            • Avanash [they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t think you need to panic.

              If you wanna be materialist about it, let’s consider this. Assume that in the near future the tech will get good enough that the majority of the population has the potential to be more happy than unhappy interacting with no one the vast majority of the time. What would be the incentive to actually scale that up and make it a reality? A ruling class living detached from physical reality cannot rule. A working class detached from physical reality cannot work. At most, some sizable minority of each class could become part of this trend.

              This would all require extensive infrastructure. Even in the version of the world straight out of every tech bro’s imagination where work has largely been automated away, you need repair people. You can’t do anything beyond maintaining current systems, with diminishing returns, without basic socialization. Essentially, there’s no incentive to scale up that lifestyle even if it becomes possible. At the very least, people need to have sex for that to last more than a single generation.

              Personally, I’m significantly less worried about the specific effects this tech will have than I am about the gradual piecemeal crumbling of society as the contradictions of capitalism heighten.

        • StewartCopelandsDad [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          because then no one would branch out or find new interests or tastes

          inb4 Spotify discover weekly AI porn

  • SerLava [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lol all they did was individually copy every frame of some video. The video looks almost exactly the same. Except not fucked up. So stupid

  • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I was promised a sexual singularity but it's just me jerking off in my bedroom, wtf

    Wait...

    singularity noun: singularity

    1.
    the state, fact, quality, or condition of being  singular
    

    ENHANCE

    singular adjective: singular

    1.
    Grammar
    (of a word or form) denoting or referring to just one person or thing.
    "the third person singular form of the verb"
    

    :walter-shock:

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Om my god this is incredibly embarrassing and the original woman in the video looks 100 times better. Like you can tell the diffused video is some fake anime brained type shit.

    Also this is just uhh

    Those kids who pay for those subscriptions have no clue these girls are fucking somebody, and that somebody is likely their pimp or boyfriend managing their accounts.

    Kids are clueless about the sex industry and fell into a fantasy that they are “fans"

    Yes this is true, but it's all the popular workers that do this, I don't think the "average " onlyfans model earns much money, if anything at all. And I'm pretty sure they're aware that onlyfans models have sex, I think that's often visible on onlyfans itself. But then it segways into...

    Jesus, get an escort and at least fuck her. What the heck is wrong with people?

    Or you could just not do that. Imagine coming to the realisation that the onlyfans situation is often exploitative and then instead of feeling any empathy for the women involved, of any sense of self respect, the solution is to now go even deeper down the rabbit hole and become a full on John because that way the transaction is more "fair" for the hypothetical man involved as he at least gets sex. 🤮

    • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Those kids who pay for those subscriptions have no clue these girls are fucking somebody, and that somebody is likely their pimp or boyfriend managing their accounts.

      Kids are clueless about the sex industry and fell into a fantasy that they are “fans"

      This is like being mad that your favorite podcast hosts aren't actually your real friends. Like, there's a parasocial element to lots of online content.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      And that's not even the worst take from that particular redditor in the thread. I could have made the entire post out of his rabid misogynist ramblings.

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • flan [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      letting some chatbots have a conversation until they exceed 32,768 tokens is basically the same thing as uploading consciousness to an eternal digital realm