Just measure how many hand widths the sun is above the horizon instead of relying on some bourgeois device. Oh, it's just a stick stuck in the ground by some numbers? Imagine having the land to stand a stick in.
:grillman: I love me a mechanical watch which goes off sync every few months and requires rewinding often
:up-yours-woke-moralists: dumb libroll leftoid starcucks-employee rentcells never experienced having an intimate relationship with a clock on your wrist
Analog is slightly better for glancing at a watch. Digital is still fine, though.
I like the granularity and the fact that there’s visual progression. My ideal clock is a digital readout with a pomodoro-style ring around it
i like both
i like a big analogue clock, good for reading at a glance from across a square
i also own an ancient casio f-91w that i got when i was 5
still works, just had to re-strap it about 20 times lmaoedit: also analogue clocks are pretty universal, whereas if you ask an american to work in 24 hour time they get wild
whereas if you ask an american to work in 24 hour time they get wild
common yank L
whereas if you ask an american to work in 24 hour time they get wild
yeah lol subtraction/thinking in Z_12 are serious weaknesses for an astounding number of americans.
still works, just had to re-strap it about 20 times lmao
You could probably get a cheap nylon strap for it at this point lol
Lol imagine not having a reminder of the cyclical nature of your day at hand.
I think for certain patterns of thinking about time that are certainly not universal among thinkers, having the geometric representation realized in the motion of the clock makes reading time immediately intuitive on a baser sensory level than when one looks at the numbers, reads them, and then thinks about "where" that is in the course of the day. Of course, with the analog clock, one can do both.
