As far as i know he wasn’t even charged with anything it may as well be “the police bullied him a lot bc he was unhoused so it’s morally right to extra judiciously murder him”
No worries, I just wanted to emphasize it because nowadays it is really popular to cite prior arrests even if the person was never or rarely convicted, because people just assume arrests indicate convictions (because why talk about flimsy charges that were dropped?)
I agree that there is the additional level that even if this dude had 40 convictions, he's still a human being, but we shouldn't let chuds get away with warping reality by pretending that a poor person with so many prior convictions would even be allowed to walk free in his 30s, it's part of a larger narrative that pretends our penal system is "soft" on "dangerous criminals".
Wild that they even think the usa is soft on crime when we jail the most people in the anglosphere. It used to be on earth at one point, I think another country surpassed us.
Americans turn a blind eye to abuse and dehumanization.
i honestly would say they dont even turn a blind eye to it as much as expect and approve of it. Americans have an obsession with the idea of law breakers being punished (violently) for transgressing. You see that shit everywhere, youtube videos and subreddits dedicated to people "getting what they asked for." My brother used to be a corrections officer at a prison and he'd tell people all the time about how theyd "get" to beat the shit out of one of the inmates bc they did x, y, or z.
Oh thank god he was a convict, that makes it morally right to extra judiciously murder him now, PHEW! I thought we had a racist murder on our hands.
As far as i know he wasn’t even charged with anything it may as well be “the police bullied him a lot bc he was unhoused so it’s morally right to extra judiciously murder him”
Literally murdered for being a nuisance. To think someone like Eric Andre could have been shot and killed for his NYC subway skits.
Being arrested and being a convict are not remotely the same. If he was a convict, they would let you know.
My bad, still chuds don't even know the difference and are applauding the white guy for taking care of a "criminal"
No worries, I just wanted to emphasize it because nowadays it is really popular to cite prior arrests even if the person was never or rarely convicted, because people just assume arrests indicate convictions (because why talk about flimsy charges that were dropped?)
I agree that there is the additional level that even if this dude had 40 convictions, he's still a human being, but we shouldn't let chuds get away with warping reality by pretending that a poor person with so many prior convictions would even be allowed to walk free in his 30s, it's part of a larger narrative that pretends our penal system is "soft" on "dangerous criminals".
Wild that they even think the usa is soft on crime when we jail the most people in the anglosphere. It used to be on earth at one point, I think another country surpassed us.
deleted by creator
i honestly would say they dont even turn a blind eye to it as much as expect and approve of it. Americans have an obsession with the idea of law breakers being punished (violently) for transgressing. You see that shit everywhere, youtube videos and subreddits dedicated to people "getting what they asked for." My brother used to be a corrections officer at a prison and he'd tell people all the time about how theyd "get" to beat the shit out of one of the inmates bc they did x, y, or z.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator