this is vaguely related to the string theory related post from a day or two ago, it's all bazinga science folks TL;DW string theory is a big thing because people that read pop science really liked it and it took a long time for physicists to come out in force and say "this is untestable garbage"

  • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Satire requires a clarity of purpose. Just because it fails the test doesn't make the liberals correct. They are fundamentally unable to see a smart rich white man as deserving anything other than praise. Which is on them for being shitlibs

    One episode a season is dedicated explicitly to how bad a person is and how he is the cause of his own problems. They even wrote a in show therapist to tell him this to his face and they multiple times show that she is correct. If that is not enough for the libs, then I am afraid they are simply libs.

    We have to deal with the fact that being evil and doing rad evil shit is fun. That is our lot as fun hating comunists.

    • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      We have to deal with the fact that being evil and doing rad evil shit is fun.

      I don't know, I have a hard time even doing an evil playthrough of a video game, by which I mean I've never been able to do an evil playthrough of a video game. Being cruel feels bad, even if nobody is actually harmed.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      We have to deal with the fact that being evil and doing rad evil shit is fun

      Being the direct executor of murder is typically not fun

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          We like the hanging of Mussolini because it represents the triumph of the Italian public over Mussolini. If the picture was more zoomed it, it would still be more nauseating than anything because it is still fundamentally a mutilated corpse. We may support killing Mussolinis, and we may be flippant or jovial in our talking about supporting killing Mussolinis, but that does not make the actual act of killing a Mussolini fun. Even if the killer is happy in the act, which would be a bit odd, we would expect it to be mainly due to the public good the killing represents rather than the visceral reality of the immediate situation.

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            deleted by creator

        • fox [comrade/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Murder should never be fun even if it's the morally correct choice

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Did you know that watching a highly fictionalized, stylized version of something is not like doing or even watching the real thing? Have you ever watched snuff footage?

              • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                I don't know that the first part is necessarily true. I think we might be stupider as a species than you give us credit for

                • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  This is not a matter of intelligence, it is a matter of the human tendency toward involuntary empathy for people right in front of them and a general revulsion towards human mutilation.

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    deleted by creator

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    Again, not universal, but at least common enough that large sections of the US consumer good and political economy are dedicated to it.

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                The bad guys were usually right. They were usually marginalized people or even communists Appart from like Rambo I mean. I am all in with whatever plot to destroy America some vaguely foreign assholes have.

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    I feel this treat policing is got to be some king of liberalism. I like watching kung fu movies sometimes. Am I a bad person for enjoying the spectical? There are enough people who do that they make those movies. Is that all propaganda?

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                deleted by creator

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The reason Rick doesn't face consequences is because he is rich and white and powerful. Same reason all the people in real life don't.

        I think sales and fandoms show that most people are attracted to the notions of being perfectly liberalized from every possibility of consequence. That is laudable that you don't like it, but hardly consequencial.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Of course. It is the dialectic. Meat is delicious. Veganism is morally and ethically correct. So we must develop a synthesis acknowledging pleasure is not sufficent.

            Power fantasies are fun. You have the antihisis. So again we have the dialectic and it does no good to deny it. It is complicated by art of this style being a hedonistic exercise.

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                I am not saying how they must be. I am saying how they are. In these contexts I have no significant power to change anything, it does seem important to me to be aware of the facts as they exist so if I ever get a chance to fix anything I will understand what is going on and would be able to make better decisions. I dunno if that is optimistic or fatalistic to be honest.

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    In the context of the sad man on a TV show being sufficiently sad or not? Maybe you are right because I cannot say. I feel like Rick is sufficiently sad to inspire me to feel leftist emotions. Like, watching him suffer from alienation and hurt others gives me reason to think of my solidarity with others.