I really liked the anticapitalist ideology, esp. at the start of the show. But ultimately the whole premise of the show doesn't work if it tries to incorporate a genuinely realistic model of how capitalism is systemically entrenched in society. The show entertains a vision of change where a single gifted revolutionary can single-handedly cut off the head of global capitalism, and the challenge is just to find where that head is. But the reason why capitalism works is that wealth and power are just decentralized enough that no individual - not POTUS, not the Fed chair, not the CEO or top shareholders of some "E-corp", and certainly not some random Chinese diplomat - really functions as a necessary linchpin of the system.

Like the whole idea of the show is just, "I found the single person who controls all the money and took it and thereby ended capitalism." That's nice wish fulfillment, but an absolutely ridiculous premise. And so when that's the basis for your show, you can do a pretty good job of giving a psychological profile of life of the oppressed under a system of concentrated wealth ownership - as the show does - but you fundamentally cannot do systemic critique or advance a particular vision of change, because the model of your fictional society only has a very superficial resemblance to how the world actually works. And that's an incurable issue if you want to write a show about "guy destroys global capitalism with just his computer."