https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak
citation 4 links to a 61-page CIA report. It was added by user Umfront. The part that they "cited" seems to be on page 30. "forgotten" is not used in the report lol
I'm just confused. Who the fuck has time to read a 61 page report from the CIA to highlight the most useless part of it and then proceed to misquote it while editing it onto Wikipedia???
Is it me or is that sentence poorly written?
It could be improved, but grammatically it's fine. Not repeating words or phrases is more for literature than informative writing. The accuracy (or lack thereof) is the bigger issue with it.