While you definitely have a point, I think there is a special level of myopia here because of how Africans in America were deliberately separated from their cultural heritage and ancestry during the slave trade, largely unlike those other groups, which I think creates some of the disconnect in how African nations are discussed compared to, say, Brazil or India. It makes it easier to develop a hyperfocus on "the people of Africa" being African-Americans rather than the people who currently live in Africa, who are treated as an afterthought.
If you look at how Hispanic or Indian people in America are treated almost like they are immigrants even if they are 5th generation, i.e. that they are "from" their ancestors' countries rather than their actual birthplace, I think this becomes apparent.
While you definitely have a point, I think there is a special level of myopia here because of how Africans in America were deliberately separated from their cultural heritage and ancestry during the slave trade, largely unlike those other groups, which I think creates some of the disconnect in how African nations are discussed compared to, say, Brazil or India. It makes it easier to develop a hyperfocus on "the people of Africa" being African-Americans rather than the people who currently live in Africa, who are treated as an afterthought.
If you look at how Hispanic or Indian people in America are treated almost like they are immigrants even if they are 5th generation, i.e. that they are "from" their ancestors' countries rather than their actual birthplace, I think this becomes apparent.