Authoritarian red fash main mods made me move it here:

"Somehow people on f/196 can see this ultra creepy lib saying all this disturbing shit on video and then swear up and down "it's being taken out of context", "he explained it was just a joke", "no, actually watch the videos, he's not saying any of that". Guess why they feel the need to gaslight everyone and pretend we're not looking at what's right in front of us? Rhythms with Fido."

"for some reason the left, both tankies and anarchists are obsessed with shitting on him. I think its because he criticizes the left and advocates compromise. Something a large part of the left considers the worst sin of all, even when for example the very ideology of anarchism is built up on making decisions that satisfy all."

"Because i actually watched the video the clips come from and don't trust the word of a fucking tankie (which isn't very anarchist of you people btw) if you actually want to know the context this entire tweeter thread was debunked by vaush"

"i'm not defending Vaush. i'm attacking leftist discourse. This thread was not created because some autist admitted to jerking to hentai. It was made because leftist love infighting. Even when in the real world when pushing for change leftists are often forced to work together."

ANCAP BONUS ROUND:

funny-clown-hammer

https://raddle.me/f/Anarchism/166865/cw-sex-consent-paedophilia-and-abuse-age-and-sexual-consent

  • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Isn't Raddle just seven nerds arguing with themselves and pretending to be multiple people? This is barely worthy of a mention in a subtweet.

    This is like that time Trotsky sent a silly letter, and we shall not reply.

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • CommieCretzl [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The top comment is killing me. My no-leftist-infighting pledge is under strain.

    Anarchists refuse to be governed, but also refuse to govern. The anarchist who would be to wield the power in a relationship would hopefully question themselves and refuse a power-skewed relationship.

    Your defense against child predators is that hopefully they just won't do that?!?!? The next paragraph goes into victim blaming "anarchist children would be raised better than to let anyone molest them"

    agony-4horsemen agony-limitless

    • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      "anarchist children would be raised better than to let anyone molest them"

      This is one of the dumbest statements I have ever heard in my life

      Hey google, what is power imbalance

      • CommieCretzl [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I should quote them directly to be fair to them.

        Also children reared in an anarchist society would already be giving/refusing consent on diverse subjects already and have much better ability to sniff out stinky situations themselves or have a decent enough circle of trusted friends/family to help them work through it.

        27 upvotes, no comments

        • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          That's really not much better. That's just not at all how that works. The molesters are the trusted friends/family more often than not, that's the entire problem. How would an anarchist society be any better in this specific regard??

          I know you're just quoting that comment, but I'm shocked that literally nobody is apparently pushing back on this within the thread

          • CommieCretzl [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Definitely not any better. Honestly a shocking thread and I expect so much better from leftists.

  • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My favorite part here is that they're like, 'We promote compromise.'

    The reason that the left sees compromise as failure is because, historically, it is. When the left compromises with capital, they do not win concessions, they simply fail slower as the working class organs of power are degraded into nothingness. The obvious exception here is China (but now China is imperial tankie so who cares according to these jokers) but even their success is far a-future, when they are able to control their destiny without American imperial hegemony hemming them in.

    And in America, why bother to promote compromise? Nobody is listening to you anyways, nobody gives a shit what you say. You can be right, wrong, or omniscient, and you will always always always be ignored in the real locuses of power, because it isn't in their interests to listen to you.

  • emizeko [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    making decisions that satisfy all

    satisfy employers AND workers with this one weird trick!

  • booty [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    the funny-clown-hammer is not a joke, im gonna have to give you a bonk on the noggin now bonk

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here's one major flaw.... expertise is most often validated by authority, and authority is legitimated by expertise.

    Deferring to ANY external authority literally means giving away autonomy.

    I... I can't with this