I remember reading that the US has no answer to hypersonic ballistic missiles. An aircraft carrier facing hypersonic missiles will end up as a very expensive artificial coral reef
Don't worry, because the Russians and CHinese don't have those. And if they do they don't work. And if they work they don't have enough range. And if they have enough range they won't be able to find our carrier battle groups. And if they find our carrier battle groups they won't making it through the point-defenses, and...
I'm pretty sure a large part of the reason the US has so many is because they're very useful when they're not fighting an enemy that's even close to as powerful militarily.
We spent more, therefore we can't lose
I remember reading that the US has no answer to hypersonic ballistic missiles. An aircraft carrier facing hypersonic missiles will end up as a very expensive artificial coral reef
Don't worry, because the Russians and CHinese don't have those. And if they do they don't work. And if they work they don't have enough range. And if they have enough range they won't be able to find our carrier battle groups. And if they find our carrier battle groups they won't making it through the point-defenses, and...
The cope some people have is incredible.
I'm pretty sure a large part of the reason the US has so many is because they're very useful when they're not fighting an enemy that's even close to as powerful militarily.
deleted by creator
The American military has a powerful tendency to do less with more.
$800 billion and they can't even supply little Ukraine with enough artillery shells
deleted by creator
How much of that money do they think is used for purposes other than enriching arms manufacturer executives and investors