It was removed because of the title, it went even further than Zenz's report did.
Also, BBC is running with this story now, citing Zenz as a source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-54260732
I don't know how normies think this isn't a big deal. It's not even entirely about whether the stories are true or not. It's about the fact that "reputable" news organizations are using an absolute lunatic as a source of info.
This is almost like if you were reading the New York Times, and they casually dropped: "according to a report by Alex Jones..." in their article. You would probably never look at that news site the same way again.
OG reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/ixjuq2/china_forces_500000_tibetans_into_labour_camps/
Some of them I guess. I think trying to push for a conflict with China is popular even among liberals now though. They usually aren't hardcore evangelicals and would probably think that book is weird. idk