Essentially the dudes think that penile circumcision robs men of sexual pleasure on par with vaginal circumcision which literally removes the clitoris. I simply can't deal with that shit.
Oh I know. I have had them try to show me that actually missing your clitoris isn't NEARLY as bad as you think! I wouldn't know, I don't fucking have one, but I SUSPECT IT IS.
I think that even if it didn't it might be insensitive to claim that having your foreskin removed is on par with literally not having a clitoris, in point of fact. Y'know, my earlobes don't have a lot of nerve endings but it would still piss me off to have them cut off, but I'm not going to try to swap war stories with the guy who lost both his legs.
comparing them as two bad things that are wrong?
Essentially the dudes think that penile circumcision robs men of sexual pleasure on par with vaginal circumcision which literally removes the clitoris. I simply can't deal with that shit.
That's absurd
Oh I know. I have had them try to show me that actually missing your clitoris isn't NEARLY as bad as you think! I wouldn't know, I don't fucking have one, but I SUSPECT IT IS.
Doesn't the clitoris have the same amount of nerve endings as the whole head of the penis? I'm pretty sure the science is on your side here
If penile circumcision involved removing the entire head of the penis, I'd be pretty willing to draw a parallel here.
I think that even if it didn't it might be insensitive to claim that having your foreskin removed is on par with literally not having a clitoris, in point of fact. Y'know, my earlobes don't have a lot of nerve endings but it would still piss me off to have them cut off, but I'm not going to try to swap war stories with the guy who lost both his legs.
Yeah good point to be fair