—political activist, author, fugitive, and step-aunt of the famed, slain hip-hop artist Tupac Shakur—was born JoAnne Deborah Bryon on July 16, 1947 in New York City, New York. Following her parents’ divorce in 1950, she moved with her mother and maternal grandparents to Wilmington, North Carolina. Shakur spent much of her adolescence alternating residences between her mother, who remarried and returned to New York, and relatives in Wilmington.

Shakur enrolled in Borough of Manhattan Community College before transferring to City College of New York, where her exposure to Black Nationalist organizations profoundly impacted her activism. Shakur attended meetings held by the Golden Drums, where she met her husband, Louis Chesimard. Members of the organization familiarized her with black historical figures that resisted racial oppression and social violence. She also began interacting with other activist groups and subsequently participated in student rights, anti-Vietnam war, and black liberation movements. In 1971, she adopted a new name: Assata (“she who struggles”) Olugbala (“love for the people”) Shakur (“the thankful”).

During a trip to Oakland, California in 1970, Shakur became acquainted with the Black Panther Party (BPP). She returned to New York City and joined the Harlem branch. Shakur worked in the BPP breakfast program but grew increasingly critical of the BPP because of their reluctance to collaborate with other black organizations.

Shakur left the BPP in 1971 and joined the Black Liberation Army (BLA), which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) branded an anarchist group. In 1972, the Bureau issued a warrant for her arrest in connection with crimes allegedly committed by the BLA.

On the evening of May 2, 1973, Shakur and two BLA companions were stopped by two state troopers for a traffic infraction on the New Jersey Turnpike, an encounter that ended in the deaths of Assata’s friend Zayd Shakur and State Trooper Werner Foerster. Arraigned on charges that included first-degree murder, Shakur went to trial seven times and was eventually convicted of Trooper Foerster’s murder regardless of her contention that the gunshot wound she sustained during the confrontation partially paralyzed her arm and rendered her incapable of firing a weapon. Despite forensic evidence that supports her assertions, she was found guilty of murder in 1977 and sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years.

In 1979, Shakur escaped from the maximum security unit of the New Jersey Clinton Correctional Facility for Women. She traveled to Cuba in 1984 where she was granted political asylum and reunited with her daughter Kakuya Amala Olugbala, whom she delivered while imprisoned.

In 2013, on the 40th anniversary of Trooper Foerster’s death, the FBI placed Shakur on the Most Wanted Terrorists list, conferring upon her the dubious distinction of being the first woman and the second domestic terrorist to appear on the list. It also increased her bounty to two million dollars.

Shakur continues to live in exile in Cuba. Since her escape, Shakur’s life has been depicted in songs, documentaries and various literary works.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • Coca_Cola_but_Commie [he/him]
    ·
    2 months ago

    So Biden did an interview with Lester Holt tonight. He doesn’t come off great, more than once he mumbled or whispered an incoherent reply to a question, and when he is present enough to speak he comes off as Trumpian. Also at the end he got weirdly irate and argumentative, or at least I thought so but I’m pretty conflict averse so maybe my barometer is off there.

    But one part of the interview did really irritate me. Holt asks if Biden thinks that his own rhetoric contributed to an atmosphere where someone would take a shot at Trump, if he’s also responsible for this sudden swell in political violence. Now as President of the United States Biden is the greatest exponent of political violence compared to any other person alive, and the democrats rhetoric that Trump is an existential threat to democracy probably did contribute to an atmosphere of possible assassination.

    But what Holt asked was if Biden thought him saying last week, well before any attempted assassination, that they should put “a bullseye on Trump” contributed to what happened. I’m not sure if Holt meant that to be an easy win for Biden or if he thinks his viewers are fucking idiots. It’s a common idiom. Biden using that word clearly wasn’t some veiled attempt at inciting stochastic terrorism.

    • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing about the "bullseye" is that it the exact same sort of ambiguous statement Trump said before Jan 6th which the Dems point to when claiming Trump was inciting insurrection.

      A good interviewer would start by reading one of those quotes by Trump and then asking "do you think this qualifies as inciting insurrection" and then turning bidens answer on its head and asking "what about you and your team saying 'Put Trump in the bullseye' does that not incite violence against trump? Even specifically calling out for someone to shoot him?"

      • Taster_Of_Treats [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean, the easy answer to that line of questioning is that there were obvious signs that the right wing was already planning to do whatever they could to delay the electoral vote counting. Which means that crowd was already in the frame of mind to do something drastic, with militia groups already moving towards Congress and however general trump's remarks, it was the exact type of permission they were seeking.