Its like Hillary walking into a working class kitchen for the first time.

They've been shielded from even critical support of China and other AES for so long they literally, not figuratively, literally cannot process that people exist that have beliefs that aren't Reddit Approved. They immediately assume it's bots or wumao. Human beings can't possibly hold these beliefs, so they must be Oriental hordes or actual robots.

      • MattsAlt [comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Damn where is America imprisoning and executing billionaires alongside harsh anti corruption campaigns in the government, maybe I'll move there

        • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don't care if they're holding people accountable for corruption. Why does a country supposably aiming for socialism have BILLIONAIRES in the FIRST PLACE??

          • RedDawn [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            They have them as a byproduct of Deng's reforms which allowed rapid development of the means of production, they need to be managed of course and suppressed by the people's democratic dictatorship, which they are. Eventually development will reach the point where they are no longer useful and can be fully done away with.

              • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]
                ·
                1 year ago

                China is hyper capitalist for executing billionaires and regulating the shit out of businesses deemed harmful for society?

                • VILenin [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You're wasting your time. You can't argue with someone who's working backwards form a predetermined conclusion.

              • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The point of Deng's reforms were to avoid getting killed in the crib by the west. Take their money and productive capacity in the short term to prevent them from couping/bombing you, and then when you've finished eating their lunch, you can do a socialist rug pull. Will it happen? Remains to be seen - but as for the capitalism, there are positive indications of tamping down on it. The anti-corruption purges are a great start. They rooted out many opportunist elements within the party, put the screws on capital and reasserted party primacy, and got the party back on track as a principled organization with serious cadre all around. That's a positive development and puts them in a stronger position to manage a transition to a worker's state when productive capacity and geopolitical conditions favor it.

                In addition, some industries are being heavily restricted and reformed to prevent bourgeois saturation. Take education for example; foreign and private schools were rampant profit making/status manufacturing machines in China. These have been all but eliminated as for profit industries due to their misalignment with socialist development. This is just an example, not an exhaustive list.

              • RedDawn [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                It's not in any sense "hyper" capitalism to begin with, it's a limited form of capitalism while the working class maintains political control via the CPC and the stage maintains ownership of the commanding heights of the economy, for starters. And since the CPC has made good on pretty much all of its stated goals (usually ahead of schedule) and consistently improved conditions for everybody in the country for decades on end, what reason do I have to doubt their process?

          • iie [they/them, he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            it was either embrace partial capitalism or get strangled out of the world economy. Deng's reforms brought a massive influx of foreign investment and expertise.

          • MattsAlt [comrade/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dogmatism and ideological purity are blinding you. It certainly should be a conversation about why billionaires exist in China, especially as they strengthen their safeguards against capital flight, but their existence alone does not discredit the great strides of progress China has made under SwCC in under a century. There are few examples of such a large mass of people seeing such substantive improvements in their lives. No matter the system, such dramatic change will result in unforseen consequences because there is so much change occuring. The measure of the response though is what is important: protecting themselves from capital flight, placing party leadership within corporations, focusing on carbon reduction through reduced pollution, tree planting, and alternative energy sources are all measurable ways the government is correcting. Where else do you see such response by those in power for their citizens? The Chinese approval for their government is incredibly high, and this is why

            • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is Chinese capitalism efficient, and has the government helped the people's material conditions (other than minorities/dissidents)? Yes. Are they aiming for socialism? No.

              • MattsAlt [comrade/them]
                ·
                1 year ago

                So I gather that the relatively few dissidents in mainstream media is how you decide that there is excessive repression? Could it be that so many in China approve of their government that there just aren't many dissidents and those who do speak out aren't covered in the media you consume unless they face consequences?

                As far as minorities, there has been progress for the LGBTQ+ community as well as religious minorities and other races. Could it be better and faster? Certainly, but that doesn't mean it's not happening or they are regressing.

                As far as whether they are progressing towards socialism, if you believe Marx and Lenin, state capitalism is a necessary step towards communism and is generally accepted as 'socialism'. What do you then classify as socialism?

          • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            They've made infinitly more progress eliminating billionaires than your flavour of socialism has

      • ShareThatBread [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Profits of a corporation benefit its shareholders, usually concentrated to very few individuals.

        Who are the beneficiaries when the profits go to the state?

      • emizeko [they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Li: At the moment, the Chinese the party state has proven an extraordinary ability to change. I mean, I make the joke: “in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies.” So, in the past 66 years, China has been run by one single party. Yet the political changes that have taken place in China in these past 66 years have been wider, and broader, and greater than probably any other major country in modern memory.

        Pilger: So in that time China ceased to be communist. Is that what you’re saying?

        Li: Well, China is a market economy, and it’s a vibrant market economy. But it is not a capitalist country. Here’s why: there’s no way a group of billionaires could control the Politburo as billionaires control American policy-making. So in China you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority. Capital does not have enshrined rights. In America, capital — the interests of capital and capital itself — has risen above the American nation. The political authority cannot check the power of capital. That’s why America is a capitalist country, and China is not.

        from https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/