What data? I would not recommend believing such theories until and unless the people who ran the study make transparent the sample population, sample size, methodology, and analysis.
E.g. If the researchers just used 10 random rich caucasian male cunts from an age range of 50-70 on Epstein's island to gather data, the results would be very different than if they used >10,000 people from an age range of 20-80 internationally across multiple cultures, ethnic backgrounds and "income levels".
The sociological data underlying the analysis and conclusions found in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male was collected from approximately 5,300 males over a fifteen year period. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female was based on personal interviews with approximately 6,000 women. In the latter, Kinsey analyzed data for the frequency with which women participate in various types of sexual activity and looked at how factors such as age, social-economic status and religious adherence influence sexual behavior. Comparisons are made of female and male sexual activities. Kinsey's evidence suggested that women were less sexually active than men.
I've only read things about the study, not done a deep dive. Your points are very valid. The links are there if you want to learn more.
The one thing that stuck out for me the most was that of those who had experienced intimacy at very early ages, most reported positive or pleasurable feelings when reflecting back. But the brain has a really wacky way of making sense of trauma, and those self-reports shouldn't be validated. I remember that being the biggest criticism of the study, but it goes into a lot more.
>but do you think chimpanzees waituntil a female chimp turns 18 before breeding with her?
Did you know chimpanzees fling diseased shit at each other and have a max lifespan of 40 years? This is like planning societal organization based on how some characteristics of our nervous system are similar to that of a lobster's. We are not chimps, we are humans.
>Being sexually mature comes well before 18in most people, so it follows that if someone is sexually mature, then they could also be viewed as sexually available.
Eugenicists bring these sort of Darwinian concepts. It's exactly what makes us more enlightened and not simply animals, so the comparison doesn't work.
>Ephebophilia/hebephilia is completely normal.
Found the lolicon.
>The data disagrees with you, though.
What data? I would not recommend believing such theories until and unless the people who ran the study make transparent the sample population, sample size, methodology, and analysis.
E.g. If the researchers just used 10 random rich caucasian male cunts from an age range of 50-70 on Epstein's island to gather data, the results would be very different than if they used >10,000 people from an age range of 20-80 internationally across multiple cultures, ethnic backgrounds and "income levels".
Ok but which country/regions were the 5,300 males and 6,000 females residing in?
This may also have had an effect on the validity in generalizing the results to a population of 7+ billion people.
Did the authors also talk about possible errors/flaws in their methods?
I've only read things about the study, not done a deep dive. Your points are very valid. The links are there if you want to learn more.
The one thing that stuck out for me the most was that of those who had experienced intimacy at very early ages, most reported positive or pleasurable feelings when reflecting back. But the brain has a really wacky way of making sense of trauma, and those self-reports shouldn't be validated. I remember that being the biggest criticism of the study, but it goes into a lot more.
deleted by creator
>but do you think chimpanzees wait until a female chimp turns 18 before breeding with her?
Did you know chimpanzees fling diseased shit at each other and have a max lifespan of 40 years? This is like planning societal organization based on how some characteristics of our nervous system are similar to that of a lobster's. We are not chimps, we are humans.
>Being sexually mature comes well before 18 in most people, so it follows that if someone is sexually mature, then they could also be viewed as sexually available.
>sexually available
yikes
deleted by creator
>I majored in Anthropology
And I'm the queen of england
deleted by creator
You already did with your original post.
Eugenicists bring these sort of Darwinian concepts. It's exactly what makes us more enlightened and not simply animals, so the comparison doesn't work.
deleted by creator
Mask off, I guess.
deleted by creator
No, but if you think flat chest is biological imperative, go imperative.