coeliacmccarthy [he/him] to Main • 4 years agolove to spend 25 minutes earnestly defending this person on your leftist podcastimagemessage-square108 fedilinkarrow-up195file-text
arrow-up192imagelove to spend 25 minutes earnestly defending this person on your leftist podcastcoeliacmccarthy [he/him] to Main • 4 years agomessage-square108 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear20arrow-down6·edit-24 years agoWeird how all the criticisms of Amber are for her dogshit politics and not her gender Ironically she would hate you using liberal “idpol” logic to defend her. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear7arrow-down11·4 years agoWeird how racists are actually really very earnestly concerned about black on black crime link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear9arrow-down6·4 years agoThe difference is I can easily debunk those arguments. You cannot debunk the arguments showing Amber as a social chauvinist, so you have to resort to this link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear8arrow-down10·4 years agoLmao you're way more invested in this than I am. link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear16arrow-down7·4 years agoThe aloof ironic deattachment defense. The last move of the cornered and defeated link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear6arrow-down6·4 years agoDefeated in what, exactly? Go on and define that first. link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear9arrow-down7·4 years agoAmber is a rightwing social chauvinist and social democrat who opposes socialism. This is a fact. You can’t counter this so first resort is bad faith idpol, second resort is “it doesn’t even matter man chill out I don’t even care anyway” Bad faith all around link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear7arrow-down7·edit-24 years agoYou believe that I am participating in a debate about an individual, which I am not. I made a comment about the internet, generally. link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear12arrow-down7·4 years agoVery convenient for you to make points and then not have to defend them link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear7arrow-down6·edit-24 years agoMy point that the internet is, on the whole, generally misogynistic? Go back and read the first comment. The subject was the internet, not any one person. link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear4arrow-down6·4 years agoWe aren’t on the internet as a whole. We are on chapo.chat. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear12arrow-down3·4 years agoI'm not in America, I'm in Texas. link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear3arrow-down4·edit-24 years agoSo what’s your point? The implication here is that all Internet posts are inherently misogynistic? The anti-idpol left is the most idpol of all. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear2arrow-down2·4 years agoEarlier you accused me of making a liberal idpol argument, now apparently I'm part of the anti idpol left. Ok. link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear2arrow-down1·4 years agoNo I said that Amber would hate that you were using an idpol argument, which you were doing. The pro-Amber contingent of Chapos are the stupidpol social democratic revisionist contingent. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear2arrow-down2·4 years agoMaybe if I was doing whatever you're accusing me of, I wouldn't be so confused by this nonsense. link
Weird how all the criticisms of Amber are for her dogshit politics and not her gender
Ironically she would hate you using liberal “idpol” logic to defend her.
Weird how racists are actually really very earnestly concerned about black on black crime
The difference is I can easily debunk those arguments.
You cannot debunk the arguments showing Amber as a social chauvinist, so you have to resort to this
Lmao you're way more invested in this than I am.
The aloof ironic deattachment defense. The last move of the cornered and defeated
Defeated in what, exactly? Go on and define that first.
Amber is a rightwing social chauvinist and social democrat who opposes socialism. This is a fact. You can’t counter this so first resort is bad faith idpol, second resort is “it doesn’t even matter man chill out I don’t even care anyway”
Bad faith all around
You believe that I am participating in a debate about an individual, which I am not. I made a comment about the internet, generally.
Very convenient for you to make points and then not have to defend them
My point that the internet is, on the whole, generally misogynistic?
Go back and read the first comment. The subject was the internet, not any one person.
We aren’t on the internet as a whole. We are on chapo.chat.
I'm not in America, I'm in Texas.
So what’s your point? The implication here is that all Internet posts are inherently misogynistic?
The anti-idpol left is the most idpol of all.
Earlier you accused me of making a liberal idpol argument, now apparently I'm part of the anti idpol left. Ok.
No I said that Amber would hate that you were using an idpol argument, which you were doing.
The pro-Amber contingent of Chapos are the stupidpol social democratic revisionist contingent.
Maybe if I was doing whatever you're accusing me of, I wouldn't be so confused by this nonsense.