opening a big book called "How to De-escalate Regional Tensions" ah yes it says clearly right here to kill more people.
so when some other country intervenes militarily to suppress this unhinged behavior the white house is gonna say what to justify entering the conflict?
"They hate us for our freedom!"
Or "I just can't imagine someone like [LEADER OF MAJORITY-MUSLIM COUNTRY] understanding the joy of Hanukkah"
ok yep that sounds right you can stop now
wow its like the real thing
I recall a video of....I can't remember the spokesperson's name at this moment (he's the guy always front and center explaining why the government is going to let Israel engage in genocide) being asked if Iran had a right to retaliate after literally being attacked, if Iran has a right to self defense. His answer? We really think Iran would be making a mistake in engaging in revenge or retaliating.
So basically Israel has a right to conduct war crimes and people should let it happen. Not sure what planet any of these people think they live on.
That's Matthew Miller, same guy who was asked his thoughts on the Lancet article that showed that there are upwards of 100,000 civilian deaths in Gaza and he said it was "unacceptable." You know, despite the fact they clearly are accepting it.
You'd think psychopaths would have good acting skills and facial control >.>
I'd call his smirk the one intended to make the person asking the questions look foolish (the gaslighting smirk), the only problem is it seems to be his only facial expression.
