I have used to be subscribed to the monarchism sub, because I found the idea zany, but man, that sub is such a stupid, joyless, humourless place, it's almost impressive. Say what you will about The Donald but at least it's full of properly unhinged Q-anon people.
I mean they're all giant Chuds and mostly White Supremacists. Or LARPers
And examples of successful Monarchies begin and end with...uhhh....Bhutan and Saudi (Saudi's clearly living on borrowed time)? There are certainly none looking cool in Europe and all the pretenders are such inbred wastrels they make Charles II of Spain look competent.
I have used to be subscribed to the monarchism sub, because I found the idea zany, but man, that sub is such a stupid, joyless, humourless place, it's almost impressive. Say what you will about The Donald but at least it's full of properly unhinged Q-anon people.
I mean they're all giant Chuds and mostly White Supremacists. Or LARPers
And examples of successful Monarchies begin and end with...uhhh....Bhutan and Saudi (Saudi's clearly living on borrowed time)? There are certainly none looking cool in Europe and all the pretenders are such inbred wastrels they make Charles II of Spain look competent.
The successful monarchies are successful for uhh... all the right people
Something tells me these people aren't very smart. They probably don't know anything about the Bhutan or KSA governments.