https://lemmy.world/post/19730104

  • lilypad [she/her, null/void]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Theres one person there whose actually making sense, and I think theyre a hexbear poster (its cowbee).

          • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
            ·
            2 months ago

            Holy shit, this one reply you got is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read lmao

            What you call a ‘Process of Material Reality’ could as easily be called G*d or the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

            • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I had to log off, I was getting genuinely upset. It doesn't get better, they get even worse

              On the other hand... tagline?

              Here it is:

              "When could we have voted for a 90% tax rate?"

              Eisenhower's presidency did see some tax rates above 90%, but that figure only applied to the individual income taxes of top earners. For married people filing jointly in 1953, for example, any income above $200,000 was taxed at 90%, above $300,000 at 91%, and above $400,000 at 92%.

              For someone who claims to know a lot about history, you sure are short on facts.

              And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please.

              smuglord

              • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
                ·
                2 months ago

                And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please.

                What the absolute fuck does this even mean fidel-wut

                • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If I'm being generous, I legitimately think they just have no clue what I am getting at by trying to baby step them through Historical Materislism, and can't fathom the idea that Great Man Theory is wrong.

                  They're so cooked I walked away, it was beyond medium-rare, beyond well-done, call that congratulations.

                  agony-limitless

                • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Idk but it's easy to fulfill. Here's a picture of one square meter in a world-historical hurricane

              • heggs_bayer [none/use name]
                ·
                2 months ago

                And if climate change is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of extreme weather events happening, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of climate change, please.

      • lilypad [she/her, null/void]
        ·
        2 months ago

        How do you argue with them? Genuinely, i could feel my brain seeping out my ears just perusing the comment section.

        Also good work stalin-heart