The screenshot is just an appetizer
Dude's actually using vote manipulation bots like a redditor lmao.
another account in that thread is using the same pictures. There is no fucking way two people in the same thread think that unironically replying with those pictures is some kind of massive own. For my own sanity, they NEED to be sockpuppets.
I confronted them on it and they just kept denying it and saying it was a conspiracy against them lmao.
mf consistently had 6 upvotes within a minute of posting each comment
shoutouts to the past few days of hexbears getting 10-15 upbears within seconds of posting lmao
thats bc we are power posters tho and we have a bit of a siege mentality rn, defending each other from the waves of libs
and we have a bit of a siege mentality rn, defending each other from the waves of libs
nah. I just upbear good takes and occasionally dunk on really bad ones if there isn't too much of a dog pile already.
Ok real talk I have literally upvoted someone within 30 seconds of their post when I'm doomscrolling comments/all/new several times.
Someone here actually caught him post on the wrong account for a response lol
Has anyone hit him with a fallacy fallacy yet?
That type really hates that the fallacy fallacy exists.
the guy seethed so hard that he had to bust out 7 alt accounts to cope
think he's dead already yall, no need to keep beating the corpse
excellent cherry picking
Show
I still can't get over this fucking graphic lol
Legit would have thought he was one of our bits if it weren't to him sockpuppeting to give himself exactly 5 upvotes each comment. Least deranged Redditor
You know what is a winning strategy in online arguments? Breaking out the debate club rules. Works every time.
They act like it's a magic spell that wins arguments
I feel like explicitly naming the fallacy committed will never get you anywhere in an argument. The way that spotting a fallacy helps you is that all instances of a fallacy can be debunked in the same way.
You didn't disprove my argument because (fallacy that can be applied to nearly anything), that means I win!
What the heck is going on in there?!
I thought the one I pulled was a bit account but he’s mod in the Star Trek comm!
Wesley isn’t supposed to be an aspirational figure!
Their other response thread accusing someone of using abuser tactics on them is wild. It gets the two wolves fighting in me for damn sure.
look, I've met a lot of cool trekies, but the bazinga brain association is a thing for a reason
Genuinely feeling blessed to have encountered this new kind of guy.
Is this what naturalists feel when they see an uncatalogued species?
Flashing a commbadge at the star trek cosplayers walking into the ren faire and admonishing them for forgetting the prime directive.
I saw this in the wild, he posted like 3 or 4 of those lame fallacy nerd explainers. There was another person in the dame thread doing the same thing
Yeah hatd to believe there's 2 people in the world, let alone one thread that unironically think posting about le fallacy is an own on anyone but themselves
Our comrades over on Lemmygrad have provided clear evidence that this clown is running multiple accounts
99% of the time someone cries about being strawmanned they either are backpedalling or just suck at expressing themselves
The other 1% of the time they are me, an actual person made of straw.
this man is the political version of a flash grenade being thrown into a library
No link, reported for rule 1.
And if you add the link, I'll report for brigading instead, as per:
Do not directly link to comments or posts of other federated instances on public posts with intent to goad or mock.
I'm serious though. This is bordering on lolcow territory. There's currently three separate threads about this user, who is a lemmy.ml user posting on lemmy.ml. Lay off
I thought you were joking around because saying you were going to report no matter what I did was ridiculous. Go right ahead
Tbh I'm planning to report all new federated Lemmy content that gets posted to the dunk tank until a mod clarifies the rules or tells me to stop.
I thought we removed that rule about admins/mods
Okay, gotcha. Understandable, even if I think some of these nerds richly deserve a dunking
Sounds like an excellent use of both your time and the mods'
Why do you want this clown that's running multiple accounts to be protected?
If anything, they turned themself into a "lolcow"
If anything, they turned themself into a "lolcow"
Do you think the original lolcows were wholly umproblematic?
This is bordering on reactionary.
This is just weird.
If you want people to stop because you're worried about defederation just say so. You can make a case for that without going to bat for this absolute clown.
That may have been a little overboard, I agree.
But I still fail to see how wanting to expose an obvious troll is somehow "bordering on reactionary".
It's possible that I'm not alone in being hyperbolic here.
In my defense, there was a third, now removed post that was being much worse about it, and that's what prompted me to start making the comparison.
the guy seems legitimately mentally unwell. we should lay off on the dunking for him.
Emma Watson
She is now old and opinionated and does woke things, so she's no longer talked about positively by
