• AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And I just suddenly remembered that there are some people who say that Prohibition wasn't even done to curb alcoholism as a social vice but to prevent workers from organizing. The idea is that workers fraternize in bars and pubs after work, which would lead to a degree of class consciousness and organizing, so by banning alcohol, it was a way of destroying a third space for workers to fraternize with one another. Browsing the Wikipedia article on Prohibition shows that rich people were largely unaffected by Prohibition because they quickly hoarded large quantities of alcohol in preparation for Prohibition and had the means and land necessary to set up their own personal production of alcohol.

    • RION [she/her]
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I'd never heard that angle before—outside of general "morals" stuff the only other lens I've seen was newly enfranchised women trying to stop their abusive husbands from getting ridiculously drunk all the time

      • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
        ·
        5 hours ago

        America did have a large problem with alcoholism at the time and needed some sort of intervention. The problem is with how it was implemented, with the feds deliberately poisoning batches of alcohol to trace where it went and mobs gaining control of everything. There was a way to get help for the huge portion of society that were antisocial violent and abusive drunkards without throwing them in jails or driving them into the arms of the mob.

        • RION [she/her]
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah I was reading more and apparently prohibition did have some good effects with reducing illness and death from alcohol

          ok now i'm completely, idealistically invested in prohibition troll