The CIA's favorite proxies strike again... (edit: my bad, intended to link archive.ph)

  • xiaohongshu [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Why is this the case?

    As Lenin wrote in Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism, imperialist wars marked a departure from wars conducted in the prior eras in that they are fundamentally rooted in the expansion of finance capital.

    The Sahel kicking out imperialists, establishing their own protectionist bloc, nationalizing resources and their economies, all of which threaten and disrupt the free flowing of trillions of dollars of American capital while shutting them out of the region.

    These acts that violate the sanctity of the Free Market must be punished, by any means necessary.

    • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is the obvious part. Resisting Imperialism is always the 3rd rail.

      The part I'm unsure of is why al-Qaeda doing the dirty work of these Imperialists. How does the state dept convince them to expand into the sahel? Or are they under the direct command/funding of the state dept?

      • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 month ago

        I've never believed they were anything but tools of the empire that the empire reins in from time to time if they go al little too far

        • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]
          ·
          1 month ago

          Right, but surely they aren't doing it because they love the empire like the little NAFO dweebs you see online.

          So the empire must either:

          • coerce them into doing their bidding
          • provide them with something they want/need
          • share mutual interests with them so they can expect them to fall in line

          I want to know which so people I try to convince don't roll their eyes when I say al-Qaeda and ISIS are western puppet orgs.

          • SadArtemis [she/her]
            hexagon
            ·
            1 month ago

            How about all three at once? Most people can at least connect the dots and recognize (it's basically universal knowledge for all but the willfully ignorant bootlickers) that the US is behind the origins of both al-Qaeda and ISIS, as the ones who funded, armed, and created the conditions from which they could exist.

            Anyone with a decent understanding of the region will also understand that the US (and before them, the Brits) made a policy of supporting the most extreme sect (Wahhabism) in the Arabian peninsula, and has a long history of toppling secular governments and leaders in the Islamic world (even democratically elected non-socialist ones), and they used these Islamist tendencies to counteract socialist and pan-Arab movements.

            To build further though, ISIS and al-Qaeda are not so different from, say, the cartels, mafias, bratvas, triads, and other organized crime (or insurgencies)- both in how they operate (besides a particular focus on terror), and in their deeply intertwined history with the US and western alphabet agencies. They provide a service to the empire- regional destabilization, and in certain areas like Syria and Iraq, also oil- and what the west supplies in exchange, apart for financing and support for these crime warlords- is to further escalate tensions and encircle their nations to destroy legitimate governments- it is a mutually beneficial relationship, as both compliment each other greatly- they feed off of each other's destabilization.