I've never seen the "both candidates are the same" argument used in a positive way lmfao
Both candidates have their hearts in the right place
Which is why that Dick Cheney endorsement was so key! Without the approval of a master there could be reasonable doubt about Kamala's ability to properly maintain her phylactery
either path will be a positive step
"Sure they're steps on a path of genocide toward WW3, but the number of steps will increase, which reads like a good thing. And when you're a spineless little lickspittle like me, and that's enough"
Draper was also one of the first investors in Theranos
smart dude
His grandfather, William Henry Draper Jr., founded Draper, Gaither and Anderson in 1958 and served as the first ambassador to NATO.
No way
Yeah if you're bourgeois or petty bourgeois then either candidate will likely benefit you
That kind of blatant, and frankly pathetic, bothsidesism literally communicates to everyone that you are going to be voting for Trump.
He's not wrong. If you're rich enough to buy private performances from candidates, both of them will "have their hearts in the right place" as far as you are concerned.
The system works as intended.
This guy?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-30/investor-tim-draper-says-he-will-absolutely-keep-funding-haley
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2018/06/13/california-three-states-ballot-tim-draper-interview-usa-today/699185002/