Having shitty takes (some of which are pretty valid if you've been doing this long enough to get jaded) does not mean there are no useful ideas. If we took that to its natural conclusion we wouldn't be able to read any of the "racism was normal at the time" writers that everyone insists must be read. Reading critically means engaging with material while also recognizing its shortcomings and the biases of the author.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
the point is that he did not deserve to have his brains scrambled by the cia and theyre the bad guys in his story
that's not wrong either though
deleted by creator
yeah he spends a couple pages just shitting on the left for no real reason
guy's an idiot
pretty sure he was an anprim lol
deleted by creator
ye i was backing you up, kaczinsky was a psycho
deleted by creator
Yeah you are right.
Do you kniw any referent of eco-terrorism?
Do the ALF and ELF have logos? Using individuals leads to this whole mess.
Having shitty takes (some of which are pretty valid if you've been doing this long enough to get jaded) does not mean there are no useful ideas. If we took that to its natural conclusion we wouldn't be able to read any of the "racism was normal at the time" writers that everyone insists must be read. Reading critically means engaging with material while also recognizing its shortcomings and the biases of the author.
wait he hated lefties why did nobody tell me this