• RiotDoll [she/her, she/her]
    ·
    5 days ago

    lmfao "information should be free but that's the author's decision not yours" buddy you fucking suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

  • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don't understand why you would even bother sharing an article if you only intend to discuss it with other people who are subscribed to the Atlantic. The Atlantic comments section are presumably at the bottom of the article. Go talk about it there lol

    • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]
      ·
      5 days ago

      If they got a DMCA notice they def would have mentioned it lol

      Just willingly and unpromptedly being a bootlicker for THE ATLANTIC hitler-detector of all organizations

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        ·
        5 days ago

        Worth mentioning but I think this is a community mod thing not an Admin thing. The admins of .ml are hard leftists

  • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Banned lol cat-vibing, first time that happened to me

    Idk, I could have been nicer but they just dismissed my whole point as "noise" anyway

    Tone-policing and removing the posts of everyone who disagrees with you and appealing to norms while repeating the same loaded point about "author's rights" while being incapable of deconstructing what that actually means when people challenge it, pure lemmitor energy lol

    • happybadger [he/him]
      ·
      5 days ago

      They just banned me too. Such a strange goober. I genuinely hope for their sake they take me up on my offer. Just email The Atlantic's editor, say "I've been a good dog who protected your property", and ask for their share of the profits. They earned it.

      • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        For reallll, got more comments out of them in this one little crit session than in the last 4 years their acct has existed, they are reallly workinggggg lol, should get paid for that even lol

        Does suck cuz there is an actual discussion to be had about the difference between getting attribution, credit, material benefits for your work vs being able to dictate the creativity and access to information of other people by enclosing an entire realm of thought or aesthetic as completely yours and completely original and therefore completely your right to dictate what happens with it for eternity or at least until a while after you die. And that these things are not the same and actually contradict each other. Cuz ofc IP and copyright law is usually used to get people to hand over their theoretical legal rights to publishing companies and mega-corps and deny them credit and benefits for their work

        • happybadger [he/him]
          ·
          5 days ago

          Paywalling your own post for someone else's benefit is such you-are-a-serf behaviour. If my dog defended my things like this I would kiss him on the lips. On the lips.

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can we make this a site tagline

    On the morning of July 4, 2012, two big headlines came from CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, in Geneva. The first was that the Italian physicist Fabiola Gianotti had made a significant discovery in quantum field theory. The second was that her PowerPoint presentation about it had been delivered in Comic Sans. Hilarity competed with outrage: Critics argued that Comic Sans was a font for children’s-party invitations, with a promise of fun and games. It was not meant for important developments in particle mass. Lisa Randall, the first tenured female theoretical-physics professor at Harvard, emailed Gianotti with congratulations and the question on everybody’s mind: Why Comic Sans? “Because I like it,” Gianotti replied. Comic Sans has long been the “Macarena” of fonts. Type aficionados don’t like it, the way coffee connoisseurs don’t like Starbucks. It is the font everyone loves to hate. But I love to love it. More than the typeface itself, I love the idea of Comic Sans: a set of letters that can make people suddenly intrigued, and sometimes cross. No other font gets people so worked up. When was the last time you had an argument over Garamond or Calibri? Comic Sans wasn’t always so reviled. In 1994, Vincent Connare, a typographic engineer at Microsoft, designed it for Microsoft Bob, a program that taught users how to operate their computer. An animated dog named Rover would pop up with speech bubbles of helpful tips. Connare thought the font should look friendly, so he designed the letters to resemble the print from the comic books he had around his office. The letters were not uniformly spaced, and carried elements that in a formal typeface would be considered unacceptable; p wasn’t a mirror-opposite of q, for example. “The initial idea took minutes,” Connare told me. “I never thought it would be set in all caps, so I didn’t worry about how these weird shapes would work that way. It looks horrible in all caps,” he said. “The joy for me was not making it right or perfect or straight.” Connare’s new letters weren’t used in the final version of Microsoft Bob; the company stuck with its original choice of Times New Roman. Still, Comic Sans escaped into the world. It appeared as an original option in Windows 95, if only because, unlike many other typefaces, Microsoft didn’t have to pay for it. Comic Sans proved immediately popular, predominantly because it didn’t look remotely like anything else—blatantly quirkier than Arial, Courier New, or any others in the then-limited drop-down menu. Comic Sans arrived at precisely the moment when computers became tools for personal expression rather than just dull workhorses, and users wanted fonts to match. The type was of its age: It met a singular need and then a popular demand, albeit an unintended, unsophisticated one. Typefaces are the clothes that words wear; fashion suits the times. “The magic is that people took to it on their own,” Tom Stephens, who worked alongside Connare in Microsoft’s typography unit when Comic Sans emerged, wrote in The Guardian. Before home computers and desktop publishing, font selection for posters and invitations was left to the professionals; Comic Sans ushered in the era of the amateur’s choice, for good or ill. “When you use Comic Sans, you’re making a statement: ‘I’m more relaxed, more creative. I may be working in this area, but this job does not define me,’” Stephens said. “It’s almost an anti-technology typeface.” And then the backlash began. People liked Comic Sans too much. It was being used everywhere, on everything—funeral announcements, museum display signs—as if fonts had just been invented and Comic Sans was the only choice. Hating Comic Sans became a meme of sorts. For this we must credit Dave and Holly Combs, a couple from Indianapolis who, in 2002, bonded over their dislike of Comic Sans’s overuse. Dave suggested that there was only one solution: It had to be banned. With a whiff of internet-age irony, he printed T-shirts, stickers, and mugs with a logo (“Comic Sans” encased within a red “No Entry” sign), and the public crusade against the typeface began. “The font wars are raging on the World Wide Web,” Canada’s National Post concluded in 2004. The same cycle has played out again and again: Comic Sans is perceived as a provocation, and social media takes the bait. In 2013, the retirement of Pope Benedict XVI was marked with a 62-page digital photo album commemorating his travels. The captions were in Comic Sans, leading to a Twitter storm. In 2019, John Dowd, a former lawyer for Donald Trump, issued a letter in Comic Sans explaining why documents requested during the first Trump impeachment inquiry would not be released. Again, Twitter storm. In 2022, Disney+ viewers discovered that they had the option of watching a program with captions in Comic Sans. Storm. An unexpected quality of Comic Sans, like the heroes in the comic books that inspired it, is its vulnerability, the sense that its fate could change at any moment. Even Dave and Holly Combs changed their mind about Comic Sans. Or at least Dave did. Holly still maintains that it’s an ugly font, but in 2019, Dave told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that he’d decided he didn’t want “anyone to be mean to anyone” anymore. He amended the message of the “Ban Comic Sans” campaign to “Use Comic Sans.” After a quarter century, the backlash seems to be winding down. The brave—or foolhardy—among us can even love to love it. But the future could hold an even better fate for the font: public opinion turning, not toward love but toward meh. In March 2023, The Face, a British culture magazine, did something extraordinary. All the text—the magazine’s name, its interview with the actor Halle Bailey, an article about the fashion designer Vivienne Westwood—was in a variation of Comic Sans. As The Face explained on its website, “Comic Sans always elicits a strong reaction. Whether that’s excitement or discomfort, we’ll leave up to you.” The issue’s designers added, “Feeling positive about Comic Sans could be seen as bad taste, while feeling negative about it could be interpreted as snobbery.” Two key factors define a great font, they wrote: It isn’t boring, and it has staying power. “Our least favorite typefaces are ones that provoke zero reactions.” But what was most remarkable about the magazine’s decision was how little commotion it caused. No storm. It quickly sold out its print run, but beyond a few reactions on TikTok, the social-media comments were about subject, not form—about Halle Bailey and Vivienne Westwood. Comic Sans was ironic. It was post-ironic. Nobody knew. Nobody really seemed to care much, either. After 30 years of trouble, perhaps Comic Sans can be just another font in the drop-down menu.

  • blame [they/them]
    ·
    5 days ago

    How is Hacker News more correct on this issue than lemmy.ml

    • heggs_bayer [none/use name]
      ·
      5 days ago

      As lib as that instance is, they generally seem to be pro-piracy. I think this is just a lone dork running a comm about fonts.

  • DengistDonnieDarko [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Lemmy mods don't want you to know this one simple trick: you can just keep copy and pasting the article.

    E: thread locked peltier-laugh

  • gaystyleJoker [she/her]
    ·
    5 days ago

    someone should send them that picture of Laurene Powell Jobs with Ghislaine Maxwell lol

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    5 days ago

    Bruv wtf is this shit

    You don't need to pre-emptively do anything about copyright. If we pre-emptively did anything about copyright then every single fucking meme in existence would need taking down.

    You only gotta do something about the copyright shit if someone asks you too. Copyright holders turn a blind eye to things all the time, you don't need to do anything.