• Runcible [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      It's amazing that I'm watching you argue with the "the dixiecrat would nominate a progressive judge and anyone who says different is crazy" person and you made it longer than they did before insulting anyone

    • CallMeALibItsAllGood [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Biden has a history of doing shitty things, therefore all his choices would be the exact same as Trump

      50 shades of Grey? What's that? All I see is a chess board!

        • CallMeALibItsAllGood [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Can we agree his nom would come from the same rolls that Obama used? Because Sotomayor and Kagan are two of the most "liberal" appointees. Then when Scalia passed, there were murmurs about Obama unfairly getting a 3rd nomination, so Merrick Garland, someone more in the middle was trotted out as compromise. But the GOP still rejected him, and the Dems thought Hillary had it in the bag.

          It is completely ridiculous to assume that Clinton/Biden would have nominated anyone anymore conservative than Garland, much less so than fuckin Clarence Thomas. Come on, man!

          You're literally saying Biden would have appointed someone to overturn Roe v Wade. I just don't know what planet that's coming from.