These are all bots. There's no way a sentient lifeform could think this. Not possible

  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is absolutely wild to me that chuds don't care at all against police violence towards poor people and POC, but a "democrat sherriff" euthanizes a squirrel and suddenly the entire system needs to be brought to its knees. I know its disingenuous, that they don't really care, its just a shitty call to action, but fuck me man

  • sisatici [he/him]
    ·
    2 days ago

    You are voting in a nation of 0.3 billion people and your concerns are "A" squarel, "A" racoon and "A" gorilla. American elections are useless but even this is too pointless

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]
    ·
    2 days ago

    For a moment I thought these were democrats who understood the Squirrel's euthanasia to be Trump's fault, the same way they see police brutality under Biden and then actually say that this will be Trump's America

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    2 days ago

    I HATE CONCERN TROLLING

    I HATE CONCERN TROLLING

    These chuds tend to be animal cruelty enjoyers (especially of the "every animal that a vegan doesn't eat I will eat two!" grillman variety) and a lot of them abuse their pets, treating them the way they treat their spouses and children.

    Unredeemable.

    Show

    • 7bicycles [he/him]
      ·
      2 days ago

      They're not actually concern trolling though. It's just typical conservative in-group out-group stuff again. Dogs are in, cats mostly, rescued or "rescued" animals most definitely, even when they're usually versions hunted for sport and/or factory farmed. On the latter I'm kind of unsure as to whether some notion of bootstrap plays into it.

      Much like with everything else they just don't realize this in-group and out-group thing, albeit that's not even limited to actual chuds as per animals.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        2 days ago

        I'm not as certain they actually care that much about squirrels, even with what you say.

        • 7bicycles [he/him]
          ·
          2 days ago

          They don't care about* squirrels*, they care about these two specific squirrels (or, well, one of them, none of them having read the actual story) because they got their heartstrings tucked by coverage about it.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            2 days ago

            That still sounds like concern trolling to me; I really doubt Harambe actually mattered to them either except as some edgy in-joke.

            • 7bicycles [he/him]
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have nothing to back it up but from personal experience most people do hate the idea of bad things happening to animals, it's just most of it is out of sight, out of mind. They don't think about where their steaks come from or, even if you'd point towards some monkey killing buisiness in the wild as per harambe, where the factory feed comes from. Doesn't really matter whether they're aware of the links there or not, it's just how things is.

              But then Harambe isn't how things is, there's not supposed to be children in gorilla enclosures. Of course, the question as to whether there should even be gorilla enclosures also doesn't play - that's just how things is - but the child in the gorilla enclosure is where their brain starts to connect "this was unnecessary", because it's easily solved, Cincinnati Zoo just has to put up some bigger fences or whatever, job's done, animal cruelty issue solved.

  • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like how the AI seems to have attempted to make the gorilla and the racoon look realistic and then went "fuck it, I'm going full cartoon on the squirrel"