Ugh these people suck so bad. On average, western leftists are worse than useless. Some bullet points are kinda interesting, even if annoying.
Ugh these people suck so bad. On average, western leftists are worse than useless. Some bullet points are kinda interesting, even if annoying.
You seem to like blaming people for things they don’t actually have direct control of.
You say I want slaves, but I obviously don’t.
You ask why I haven’t removed the government… like I have the button?
It’s very clear you’re not interested in world where everyone comes together. You want a few people to suffer first. And that’s where we differ.
Everything you’re saying about me is wrong. It doesn’t make me feel bad. It just makes you look intolerant.
Say more about how I want to colonize things so I can laugh.
✌️
Haha. You are literally opposed to the liberation of Vietnam, Korea, Mozambique, Cuba, etc., because the liberation movements were 'oppressive'.
You have full control over you coming here, antagonising us, and talking about how communists in the rest of the world should have no defense against your empire.
You claim that those governments are/were oppressive, but you are yet to present any viable alternative. Just vague 'oh, they should just have no governments', completely unsupported by history.
Cool. How do you suggest the rest of the world stops subjugation by your empire - which western anarchists like you have not only done nothing against, but have even supported? And do consider that if your suggestion is unsupported by history, you are just being unserious.
So far, it seems that you just want NATO to restore the old colonial gold over the rest of the world.
Why do you want the rest of the world to follow your vision that is unsupported by history that you (plural) have never managed to achieve anywhere, and while being completely against what had worked and what has massively improved people's lives, then? You have no examples to show, and you argue that the rest of the world should be rid of defenses against you.
The USSR was one of the most consistent and successful forces in having most of the world come together to fight colonialism. You argue that that was 'oppressive'.
You quite literally want for people to suffer under capitalism until you somehow topple every government (somehow, while doing nothing and while supporting the states and people who suppress any sort of change for good that does not involve getting rid of governments immediately), and are unwilling to support any changes for the better until then.
You literally claimed that the movements that fought against colonialism and capitalism successfully were somehow had and oppressive.