RoabeArt [he/him] to Slop. • edit-26 days agoPls don't do Project 2025 😭imagemessage-square44 fedilinkarrow-up1137file-text
arrow-up1137imagePls don't do Project 2025 😭RoabeArt [he/him] to Slop. • edit-26 days agomessage-square44 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]hexbear69·6 days agoThis motherfucker can kill hundreds of thousands of Palestinians but won't kill a single Republican. link
minus-squareEvilsandwichman [none/use name]hexbear19·6 days agoBiden would French kiss Kissinger before he'd sneeze to save a Palestinian life link
minus-squarenohaybanda [he/him]hexbear12·6 days agoHe should pop a vessel and spare us from watching a moment more of this farce link
minus-squareSacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]hexbear25·6 days agoThere's even precedent for the President to legally have anyone killed now with the 'absolute immunity' ruling Joe Biden could just have a drone turn Trump into a pink mist and memories link
minus-squarefreagle@lemmygrad.mlhexbear4·6 days agoI don't think that's precedent, is it? Was the court case about murder? linkfedilink
minus-squarePhilosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear20·6 days agoIt was explicitly raised as a hypothetical during the oral arguments at SCOTUS, and Trump's team argued that it would be covered by immunity as long as the President thought he was genuinely acting in the national best interest. link
minus-squaregay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]hexbear12·6 days ago Trump's team Justice Samuel Alito, but same difference link
This motherfucker can kill hundreds of thousands of Palestinians but won't kill a single Republican.
Those Republicans are his close, personal friends.
Biden would French kiss Kissinger before he'd sneeze to save a Palestinian life
He should pop a vessel and spare us from watching a moment more of this farce
YEAR OF 4 PRESIDENTS. KEEP HOPE ALIVE
There's even precedent for the President to legally have anyone killed now with the 'absolute immunity' ruling
Joe Biden could just have a drone turn Trump into a pink mist and memories
I don't think that's precedent, is it? Was the court case about murder?
It was explicitly raised as a hypothetical during the oral arguments at SCOTUS, and Trump's team argued that it would be covered by immunity as long as the President thought he was genuinely acting in the national best interest.
Justice Samuel Alito, but same difference
Definitely
no more half measures walter