Do we need to die for this to happen? inshallah

  • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Anyone read the Children if Time trilogy? I don’t wanna ruin too much but there’s civilization of octopuses that communicate through a combination of strobing skin patterns and interpretative dance and every single one of them is an artist. It’s great.

  • sempersigh [he/him]
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Climate Change eats man....

    Octopus inherits the earth...

    Show

  • genderbitch [she/her, it/its]
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It's real sad to me how all the other intelligent lifeforms on this planet are biologically limited in one way or another. Rats? Live a few years. Octopi? Live a few years. Dolphins? The fuck they gonna do with those flippers? Ravens? Ditto, but wings. They can't even masturbate. Humans hit the evolutionary jackpot.

    • foxontherocks [undecided, undecided]
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think the raven's bigger problem is that they are just too weak. Humans aren't very strong by animal standards but we are strong enough to break wood and rocks. How would a raven ever get past the stone age. You'd need an entire flock of ravens with stone axes to fell a tree.

      • genderbitch [she/her, it/its]
        ·
        4 hours ago

        To be fair, I feel like ravens would probably need a lot less wood than humans do, so branches & young trees would likely suffice.

    • kittin [he/him]
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Whenever I read an article like this or about the probability of extraterrestrial civilization, I think there is the enormously hubristic assumption that “technological civilization” is, from an evolutionary perspective, a long-term success strategy.

      Like, behaviorally modern humans are maybe 100,000 years old, the epoch in humans actually do enough stuff in the world to be force relevant to climate and biodiversity is maybe 5-10,000 years.

      Maybe the answer to the Fermi paradox is obvious and maybe being a shark who swims and eat fish is an evolutionarily superior pattern, technologically civilized societies are evidentially doomed by the observation made in the Fermi paradox.

      • Thorngraff_Ironbeard [he/him]
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah if we accept that at the very base the only criteria for success in a living organism is propagation then bacteria are by far the most successful. I personally agree and think sapient life is an aberration.

      • genderbitch [she/her, it/its]
        ·
        6 hours ago

        True, no opposable thumbs, though. Perhaps they could develop some kind of written language, but I don't think it'd be nearly as easy as it is for us and I doubt they'd be able to do much with complex tools.

    • Carcharodonna [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      There are sharks they’ve found that are 400 years old. I’m telling you, when sharks get larger brains and opposable thumbs, humans are done for. transshork-happy

      • AntifaSuperWombat [she/her]
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Greenland sharks reach sexual maturity after 150 years. So it’s going to take a long ass time for evolution to do it’s thing.

  • HarryLime [any]
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Then why aren't they doing it now? Oh, do you need humans to die out first? Lame excuse. More like Fraudcopuses!

  • Carcharodonna [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    If octopuses can gain sentience and create underwater civilizations, maybe there’s some hope for sharks as well? blahaj