U.S. retail sales of plant-based foods grew 11.4% last year

One of the biggest growth categories last year was plant-based eggs

“Companies know that you need to have plant-based as a solution, especially when we’re talking about doing it sustainably and safely,” she said.

Bonus:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-30/good-news-for-climate-change-as-world-loses-its-taste-for-meat

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations estimates that meat production—a decent proxy for consumption—dropped in 2019, and it forecasts a decline again this year.

outline version

  • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I hate to be the pessimist but there is very little evidence that plant based products are cutting into the animal agriculture product markets in the US as US production of meat and dairy products continues to grow. Most of the reduction in global meat production in 2019 was due to a porcine disease in Asia that resulted in the culling of millions of hogs and 2020 forecasts are primarily due to Covid disrupting markets and production.

    • avogadro_seed [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      and 2020 forecasts are primarily due to Covid disrupting markets and production.

      Even if it's just a disruption it's great

      market disrupted, meat expensive, people eat more veg for 6 months, meat cheap again, people don't go back

      If you get get someone to be vegetarian for 1 month they'll probably never go back to their old eating habits. They may go back to meat but not the same amount.

    • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      The final quote i mentioned from the link is just about the US production decreasing in 2019, long before COVID-19 reached here.

      Maybe i'm misreading what you mean, but i didn't mention global meat production at all.

      • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        The UNFAO report the last Bloomberg article references concerns global production. In the US, production rose by something like 2 billion pounds from 2018 to 2019. You can look at the USDA data here (this EDIT: This spreadsheet does not have 2020 data but is much better organized if you want to look at yearly production). As of August the US was actually ahead of meat production for the same time last year.

        • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          huh?

          i'm seeing for 2018 the total sum of red meat is 53 million pounds. For 2017, 51 million. For 2019, 36 million for 2020, 36 million.

          That still shows 2019 having less meat production than the most recent years????

          additionally, this may account for the jump in 2020.

          https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/may/19/millions-of-us-farm-animals-to-be-culled-by-suffocation-drowning-and-shooting-coronavirus

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            First, idk how you are insulting libs with your claims, as libs are all for market based consumption solutions, unless of course you are trying to call all leftists who consume meat products libs, in which case I am SO HAPPY to reignite this struggle session.

            Second, what he is saying is that vegan consumption choices (within the U.S.) have not actually decreased the amount of meat production. If you look at the graph for total production numbers of both red-meat and poultry, the number has continued to rise even into 2020. What has increased are the amount of production of plant based products, which is great, but without a corresponding drop, this simply is business as usual for capitalism which will more than likely just produce and throw those meat products away than produce less.

                  • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 years ago

                    Global meat production loss likely has little to do with vegan ideology.

                    Edit: You know what, I am being crabby. Here's the sich. I may or may not work at a large cheese packaging plant. Now, I personally consume vegetarian food, except with family and friends, but during processing the company throws out something like over 50,000 pounds of cheese from the facility yearly. Most of it is fine to eat, it's just the packaging got screwed up or someone put almonds in instead of cashews. Production runs and increases regardless of actual consumer consumption rates, because the margins of profit are high enough on the retail end to justify those losses. They also package vegan cheese, but instead of cutting into production time for other products, shifts were moved around to accommodate larger cleaning crews so production continues to increase for all products. And this was during 2020.

                    My point is that until we solve the 'capitalism that requires number to go up' problem, it will be difficult or nigh on impossible to address the animal harm and consumption problem.

          • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            The 36 billion pounds is from January to August. The third quarter update was published in September so it is comparing the third quarter data from the previous year to this year. Red meat in 2019 was like 55 billion pounds and in 2018 it was 53

            • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
              hexagon
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              Are we looking at the same spreadsheet?

              edit: oh jfc we were, you were looking at "all supply and disappearance" for some reason instead of "All meat statistics"?????

              edit 2: okay i see what you mean now. Still, that's not really my fault for bloomberg reporting misleading information, i literally just quoted the article

              • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                You didn't do anything wrong, I think it's a really good example to learn that vegan capitalism doesn't really affect the conditions of animals. I've seen the bloomberg article before and it inspired me to sift through that data and start crunching those numbers a bit.

                • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
                  hexagon
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  yeah that's fair. I think it is making SOME difference, definitely not enough, i just hate it when libs are like "there's not ethical consumption under capitalism" and try to excuse their unethical behavior as it it doesn't matter. I mean the grim truth is animal's lives are at stake, but people seem to think that since we can't stop it until we idk, magically turn socialist and i guess force people to stop killing naims, we shouldn't even bother trying to live more ethically like it won't affect the world in any way until then. But i mean, it is. The fact that people are buying vegan products more should tell you people are at least more open to trying them, if not fully converting to being vegan.

  • seven [any]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    deleted by creator

      • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
        hexagon
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        mmmm, that'd require them DOING things though. in my experience they agree with it on an ethical level but keep eating their chicken tendies while calling rude vegans 'extremists'

        • kaka [he/him,they/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          yes true I didn't mean they go vegan, I meant that they don't really oppose vegan products either. People who oppose vegan products for existing at the supermarket mostly aren't libs, but some kind of chud

          • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
            hexagon
            ·
            4 years ago

            oh gotcha yeah. I've also even seen libs use plant milks if they aren't vegan, which is barely a step at all, yet still good

  • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    the big indicator for me was when my local shop started selling my bougie nut milk
    that place doesn't sell fucking bananas, but it sells 6 types of vegan milk alternatives now lol

  • OgdenTO [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    So was there a slow down in the clearcutting of the Amazon as well? Or did that increase?

    It's not that market solutions don't work, they just don't work to the extent we need or in the timescale to make a difference.

    Don't get me wrong, this is good, it's just not enough and not fast enough.

    • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      I agree it's not good enough or fast enough. I'm just pushing back on the lib argument that it literally does nothing.

      • OgdenTO [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        You know what? I thought about it some more, and the only thing that market solutions do is allow companies to change their production within a business time scale, or other companies will take over the market.

        This does not change the relations between the consumer, the producer, and the animals in any meaningful way, it just encourages half measures that protect the status quo.

        Encouraging market solutions, by entrenching the status quo is inherently a liberal reactionary view.

        I think a radical change in the regulations and environmental costs of meat production, with a nationalization and shutdown if meat processing facilities would be the only way that we could effect any actual pressure on the world meat markets.

      • shitshow [any]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Libs literally do nothing, so no point in trying to arguing your veganism to them.

        Completely unrelated and you are under no pressure to explain but: how would I pronounce your pronouns and what are they supposed to represent about your gender? I haven't seen Xey/xem used before.

        • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
          hexagon
          ·
          4 years ago

          np lol :) essentially i just don't feel like she or he fits me, kinda like being forced to use a nickname i hate. Xey/xem is the closest i feel to what represents me, that's basically it. It's a pretty new thing, right now it just makes me feel good to see them next to my name. Here's a little usage guide, though of course you can always just call me by username or say 'comrade' :)

          https://pronoun.is/xey/xem/xyr

          • shitshow [any]
            ·
            4 years ago

            NO GENDERS, ONLY COMRADES.

            But thanks.

        • OgdenTO [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          If you think personal consumptive choices count as something significant, I think you are misled. They are good, but not sufficient, and often do harm by taking the wind out the sails of further action or by creating a neoliberal "personal responsibility" viewpoint that accepts the neoliberal framing of environmental and ethical issues.

          Like, it's not my fault that animal husbandry or meat factories exist so I don't need that guilt. Instead empower me to work towards solutions that can show real change, and likely veganism will be a logical byproduct.