• randint@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did not defend Nazi apologia. I did defend Zenz on his opinions about the genocide against Uyghurs in China.

        • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
          ·
          1 year ago

          His opinions about the "genocide"? The fact that you recognise that they are entirely opinions and not facts just shows how inauthentic the claims are.

            • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
              ·
              1 year ago

              That's not what "I did defend Zenz on his opinions" means at all. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you'll lie about what you said only a few centimetres away?

        • Egon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

            • Flaps [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, some of my comments are done with the aim of making hexbear look bad.

              This is your previous comment

            • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              It's funny because calling you out on your dishonest and racist shit is the original source of your grudge against us

              Now you come to our site for the explicit and sole reason of starting shit with us

              And you act indignant at being called out for your behavior once again and act like you're vnidicated

              logout

              • randint@lemm.ee
                ·
                1 year ago

                As I have already clarified multiple times, I am not here to start shit. I am here to express my opinions, just like the hexbears do on those news posts on China.

                • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A Hexbear calling me out for being a troll? Calling my claims rooted on dishonest bullshit? Wow.

                  And how does this comment fit into that objective? Because this looks like you engaging with and in shit.

                • Egon
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  deleted by creator

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
              ·
              1 year ago

              you should stop making ad hominem attacks and instead watch this countdown for an important message then click the spoiler below afterwards countdown

              Don't click until the 60 seconds are up, silly!

              Ad nom on deez nutz ayy lmao

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      democratically elected president of Taiwan

      lmao

      • randint@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did I say anything wrong? Was the process democratic? Yes. Was he elected? Yes. Was his title "president"? Yes. Did this happen in Taiwan? Also yes.

        • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          By this same logic, Xi is the democratically elected leader of China but for some reason you keep calling it a dictatorship

          • randint@lemm.ee
            ·
            1 year ago

            No? Xi does not even claim himself to be democratically elected by the citizens.

            • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              By the citizens? You didn't say that part lol. That disqualifies the U.S. as a democracy.

        • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Taiwan is a fascist colony and democracy is not possible until the junta is gone and western influence wiped away

        • Egon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • randint@lemm.ee
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don't think the people of North Korea have any say in who gets to be the president/chairman/general secretary.

            • Egon
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              deleted by creator

    • comr [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Judging by your post history you are definitely trying to stir shit up.

        • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          you look how many of them are still federated with nazis and transphobes and tell us again how sad it is those freaks defederated

        • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          And? There's only like three major instances worth being federated with in the first place.

        • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hold that it is bad as far as we are concerned if a person, a political party, an army or a school is not attacked by the enemy, for in that case it would definitely mean that we have sunk to the level of the enemy. It is good if we are attacked by the enemy, since it proves that we have drawn a clear line of demarcation between the enemy and ourselves. It is still better if the enemy attacks us wildly and paints us as utterly black and without a single virtue; it demonstrates that we have not only drawn a clear line of demarcation between the enemy and ourselves but achieved a great deal in our work.

        • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one here cares because they're filled with losers like you. It is a privilege to federate with us. Blahaj was on some transphobic and ableist bullshit, so they lost that privilege.

    • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you said in your comment is slander and hurts my reputation. I would like to politely request that you take down the allegations.

      It's not slander if it's true.