Hopefully won't pass

  • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
    ·
    1 day ago

    I'm going to take a wild guess and say this bill doesn't do the same for CNC machines despite those being literally how you make actual guns. Fucking NY liberals.

    • wtypstanaccount04 [he/him]
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Gun control policies being made by people who have never shot a gun, classic liberalism

    • gay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]
      ·
      1 day ago

      A Shapeoko is only a few hundred dollars more than a Bambu X1C and it makes functional weapons that don't jam. This does nothing to prevent people making guns in garages.

    • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The Bill is 387 words long. It provides a definition:

      "THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTER" MEANS A COMPUTER OR COMPUTER-DRIVEN MACHINE OR DEVICE CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT FROM A DIGITAL MODEL.

      A random google search provides the following definition:

      Computer numerical control (CNC) is a manufacturing method that automates the control, movement and precision of machine tools through the use of preprogrammed computer software, which is embedded inside the tools.

      I agree the bill is stupid. It’s equally stupid to make this a conservative vs liberal issue. This is a ruling class vs subservient class issue.

      Stop playing into artificial distinctions designed to fracture the power of the many. Be better.

      • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
        ·
        1 day ago

        I'm a communist. This bill is pushed by liberals, specifically the Democrat-flavored liberals rather than the Republican-flavored liberals. Both parties are capitalist and fall under the umbrella of liberalism as it is classically defined, regardless of whatever that term might mean in American discourse.

        • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Thanks for clarifying. Considering it is a NY state bill, I assume you can understand my confusion.

      • crime [she/her, any]
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s equally stupid to make this a conservative vs liberal issue

        He isn't. We're communists here.

        • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          My point exactly. This is a bill promoted by the capital class (that can get access to weapons easily) designed to prevent labor from having the means of producing their own means of self defense.

          The last line of his comment is

          Fucking NY Liberals

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
            ·
            1 day ago

            It is NY liberals pushing this bill though. It is specifically an American NY liberal bill.

            Just because he is specifying the particular sect of capital class ideology doesn't mean he is incorrect, nor that he is specifically positing a 'liberal vs. conservative' dichotomy. You are reading that into the statement for some reason, which is outside my business.

            • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s hardly being pushed through. It’s currently in an assembly committee. You are reading liberals pushing a bill that will likely not even make it to the floor into the current state of the bill for some reason, which is outside my business.

              • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Do you just make a habit of reading incorrect context into things that aren't there?

                It is legislation being introduced and supported (colloquially 'pushed') by NY liberals, I never implied it was being shoved through committee or forced through the legislature.

                Look, not to be pedantic, but you've already moved the goalposts once, care for a second time?

                • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  When did I move goal posts? Honest question.

                  It’s a NY state bill on an issue related to firearms. In that context it is not strange to read the word liberal on the same context.

                  Now that I understand you mean liberal v communist it is more clear. Although I don’t understand the significance of a NY liberal vs any other state.

          • crime [she/her, any]
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, exactly. Siding with capital against the workers is libs doing lib shit. Nothing to do with the blue-versus-red team sport of US bourgeois electoral politics.

            • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
              ·
              1 day ago

              Never said blue-red. Said conservative-liberal. The point I made is that those are all arbitrary distinctions designed to turn worker on worker.

              • crime [she/her, any]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Yeah, you're the one invoking that false dichotomy in response to "Fucking NY liberals" — especially when the liberals in question are the lawmakers here, not workers. Liberalism is a real ideology, and one that's in opposition with and derided by communists. Complaining about liberals making liberal policy decisions isn't anti-worker in any way.

                • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Please list the liberals, other than the sponsor, that are in support of the bill.

                  Edit: assuming that you mean liberal v communist as raised in the other posts, my confusion came from the qualifier “NY.” Aren’t most US politicians liberals in this context? What is it about the NY specific variant that matters in the context of the bill?

            • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Technically, they are all conservative liberals (in the legislature) at this point. There was a point in time when there were radical liberals who wouldn't be opposed to a little outside the law tomfoolery.

  • pancake@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Many consumer 3D printers, especially well-known ones like RepRap's, or Prusa or Voron, are open-source designs made to be assembled from general-purpose pieces. Many people already make them in this way. Whoever came up with this didn't do a basic background check on the tech...

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]
      ·
      1 day ago

      The whole thing is fear mongering. The libs genuinely believe you can make a fully automatic AK-47 in .50 caliber ("Just upscale the barrel lol") out of resin.

    • sovietknuckles [they/them]
      ·
      1 day ago

      Whoever came up with this didn't do a basic background check on the tech...

      The law was likely requested by a billionaire. Practicality doesn't matter as much when it's a direct request

    • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      1 day ago

      China is going to be sending a colony ship to Alpha Centauri while the United States outlaws screwdrivers and books which teach you how to make screwdrivers.

    • HermanGaydos [comrade/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 day ago

      It's just like the California micro-stamp laws, where technically the technology exists, but in practice it just restricts everything.

  • crime [she/her, any]
    ·
    1 day ago

    NY introduces bill to require background checks for any materials capable of creating the-doohickey

  • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I wonder if this works in reverse? If banned from owning firearms = banned from owning 3d printers,
    then having a 3d printer should be an automatic firearm license, yes? of course not because logic don't government

    • Nakoichi [they/them]
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every time I see mentions of Abe I think of another Abe because the parallels are striking. No pun intended.

  • plinky [he/him]
    ·
    1 day ago

    drone-dropping lead weights still legal, acme contraptions stay winning